Quantcast
Channel: David Bushman, The Paley Center for Media
Viewing all 23 articles
Browse latest View live

2011: A Very Good Year

$
0
0

My very personal list of top twelve shows of 2011 (one for each day of Christmas). Be careful; spoilers included…

12) The Killing (AMC): OK, so I'm a contrarian: maybe I'm just touting this show because 99% of the free world screamed for the head of producer Veena Sud in the aftermath of the season finale, which not only didn't identity Rosie Larsen's killer, but ended with the controversial revelation that Seattle copper Stephen Holder was apparently duplicitous. For me, the twist reinforced the show's Northwest noir ethos: no one could be trusted. Imagine how delighted I was then to recently read this quote from Homeland producer Alex Gansa, in reference to The Killing: "The fact that some viewers were dissatisfied with their finale is a cautionary tale only insofar as a bold storytelling choice is sometimes unpopular."  

11) Bedlam (BBC America)/American Horror Story (FX): Nice to see the horror genre meaningfully transcend the pretty-young vampire/witches/werewolf thread that has so dominated since Buffy, thanks to these two haunted-house skeins (not that the British Bedlam—a weird amalgam of Melrose Place and Sixth Sense—doesn't have plenty of pretty young people of its own). I'm taken with Bedlam's Kate, a remarkably nasty iteration of her archetype—the comely young damsel in distress. American Horror Story —totally outrageous in just the way you'd expect from the makers of Nip/Tuck and Glee —likewise brims with unsavory characters (most of them, it turns out, dead), but it does have Connie Britton, and beyond that it's just freakin' scary.

10) Fringe (Fox): I've opined at length already about this soulful X-Files derivative (and I mean that in the most flattering way possible), which seems forever on the verge of cancellation, but what impresses me most about it now, in the midst of its fourth season, is how the writer/producers constantly reinvent it, introducing alternate realities and characters, at great risk but with great reward. Put another way: nobody's phoning it in.

9) Parks and Recreation (NBC): For Party Down obsessives like myself, any show that gainfully employs Adam Scott is celebration-worthy, but Parks and Rec's ensemble cast is so deep it's hard to find everyone the screen time they deserve (Aziz Ansari seems particularly underused , though, I don't know—maybe I just can't get enough).  Here is character comedy at its best, and new ones just keep popping up—first Ben Wyatt (Scott) and Chris Traeger (Rob Lowe, in a career-redefining role), then the truly loopy Jean-Ralphio (Ben Schwartz). Big creative challenge ahead: now that Ben and Leslie (Amy Poehler) are officially together, can they still be funny?  Speaking of funny, check out this P&R/Twin Peaks title-sequence mash-up.

8) Bored to Death (HBO): Season-three's final moments filled me with dread—not because Jonathan (Jason Schwartzman) was locking lips with a chick he knew to be his half-sister, but because of the sinking feeling that I may never again experience the joy of watching Schwartzman, Ted Danson, and Zach Galifianakis incarnate Bored to Death's staggeringly infelicitous trio of protagonists, due to a precipitious ratings drop (which, alas, turns out to be true, now that HBO has canceled the show). Jonathan's absurd predicaments (remember when he showed up in George's office in a latex bondage suit, after the magazine had been purchased by religious fundamentalists?)…Ray's relentless suffering for his love of Leah…George's weed-fueled botched rescue operations…most of all, the truly poignant bond among three incorrigible man-children—somehow life always seemed a little less bleak after a dose of Bored to Death.

7) Justified (FX): Woo-hoo! Season three of Elmore Leonard's Kentucky lawman series is (finally) in sight (January 17), and while I'll miss the demented machinations of sinister (and now deceased) hillbilly mama Mags Bennett and her three-stooges sons, we still have those transcendent interactions between U.S. Marshall Raylan Givens (Timothy Olyphant) and his ever-erratic nemesis Boyd Crowder (Walton Goggins), to look forward to. Pass the moonshine! 

6) Parenthood (NBC): Is Jason Katims television's most underhyped producer? He's now transformed two theatrical films—first Friday Night Lights and then Parenthood —into thoughtful, artfully crafted TV series defined, above all, by emotional authenticity.  If I cared at all about awards, I'd wonder why Parenthood has never been nominated for an Emmy, why Peter Krause garnered three nominations for Six Feet Under but has none for Parenthood, and why Monica Potter—whose performance as Kristina Braverman seems utterly devoid of glamour, ego, or artifice to me—has never been rewarded, but really…who cares? Surely these people know they're doing exceptional work?  

5) Homeland (Showtime):  Everybody's got a secret, sonny.


Has there ever been a darker episodic TV "hero" than Carrie Mathison (Claire Danes), a brilliant yet utterly tortured CIA agent, whose emotional pain becomes so debilitating that she voluntarily undergoes shock treatment? Meanwhile, Marine Sergeant Nick Brody (erstwhile Band of Brother Damian Lewis) battles demons of his own, having been turned into an Al-Qaeda sleeper agent after eight-plus years as a prisoner of war in Iraq. Homeland is a mesmerizing brew of character drama and suspense, nailing the post-9/11 zeitgeist with its depiction of a complacent world where people have simply grown weary of the war on terror.

4) Archer (FX): "The funniest show currently on TV," the Paley Center's Arthur Smith wrote last year; no argument here, but Archer scaled new heights in March with a stunning two-episode cancer arc that somehow managed to be irreverent, hilarious, and poignant, all at the same time. Loved the Magnum, P.I. homage; who would have figured Delaney for a Regis guy?



3) The Walking Dead (AMC):  "How AMC can revive The Walking Dead from its season 2 slumber" denofgeek Tweeted. What slumber? Granted the action has been less fast and furious this season, and walker sightings fewer and far between, but the character development—particularly involving Daryl (Norman Reedus) and Shane (Jon Bernthal)—has been masterful.  Redneck Daryl's episode-four presentation of the Cherokee rose to Carol surely ranks among the iconic moments of the series, and the explosive final moments of the midseason finale—how many shows would have had the nerve to resolve the search for Sophia thusly—were particularly impressive in their assertion that no matter how dark and angry Shane has become, he was, in this case, one hundred percent correct. Now can we please find out what Dr. Jenner whispered in Rick's ear at the end of season one?

2) Game of Thrones (HBO): Read all about it.

1) Community (NBC): I don't want to overstate my case, but has any other network comedy ever been so committed to formal and conceptual innovation—anime, stop-motion animation, stealth homages to My Dinner with Andre and Hearts of Darkness, a faux clip show, the bottle episode devoted to who swiped Annie's pen (Troy's monkey), and on and on and on—while simultaneously—and unabashedly—embracing the most conventional of all sitcom maxims: you gotta have heart? Exhibit A: "Remedial Chaos Theory," in which Jeff (Joel McHale) inadvertently creates seven alternate timelines during a game of Yahtzee by throwing a die to determine who will go downstairs to let the pizza man in.  The episode, which I maintain ranks among the greatest in sitcom history, is hilarious, thought-provoking, character-incisive, and, ultimately, meaningful. All I want for Christmas is another season of Community.


NBC, Think Hard Before Canceling "Community"

$
0
0
Note from David Bushman: Intern Ali Glatt, a senior at NYU's Tisch School of the Arts for Film and Television, is a woman of impeccable taste in TV, as she demonstrates in this guest post about series canceled prematurely…

When Community's recent Christmas episode ended, it suddenly dawned on me that this was going to be the last episode of the show before NBC benches it until who knows when—if they ever bring it back. The idea that yet another amazing, ahead-of-its-time show may never return reminded me of several previous shows that were canceled way too soon. Here I have put together a list of six of my favorites, all of which lasted between one and three seasons, and all of which are still watched religiously by their fans, who surely secretly hope that one day they will return. I only hope that Community will not join this list anytime soon.

 

6. Undeclared (2001–2003)
Undeclared
, from producer Judd Apatow, follows its protagonist, Steven Karp (Jay Baruchel), as he starts a new chapter in his life: college. The show chronicles Steven and his friends as they confront new responsibilities, freedom from their parents, and new and exciting adventures and experiences. Unfortunately, Undeclared, which naturally could have last four seasons (the length of most college educations), was canceled after only seventeen episodes. Fans of Apatow's Freaks and Geeks can see Seth Rogen and Jason Segel, and the cast also included such talented performers as Carla Gallo (I Love You, Man), Charlie Hunnam (Sons of Anarchy), Monica Keena (Entourage), and Timm Sharp (‘Til Death).

 

5. Dead Like Me (2003–2004)
After Georgina "George" Lass (Ellen Muth), an unhappy college dropout, is killed by a toilet seat that falls from the MIR space station, she finds herself a part of a group of grim reapers led by Rube (Mandy Patinkin). Each day Rube hands every member of the group a note with a name, location, and time of death, and it's up to each reaper to identify the victim and remove that person's soul before they can feel any pain from their death. George and her fellow reapers are all very different, colorful characters who learn to depend on one another in their lives after death. The show, full of dark, cynical humor, was canceled after two seasons and twenty-nine episodes. In 2009, a feature-length version was released, but did not live up to fans' expectations. Rube was gone, and Laura Harris, who had played one of my favorite characters, the southern belle Daisy Adair, was dreadfully replaced by Sarah Wynter.

 

4. Party Down (2009–2010)
This Starz show follows an L.A. catering team comprising aspiring actors and writers who get into trouble each episode as they try, inappropriately and unprofessionally, to advance their own careers. Party Down was created by Veronica Mars veterans John Enbom, Dan Etheridge, and Rob Thomas, plus actor/writer/producer Paul Rudd, and featured an endlessly talented cast—Adam Scott (Parks and Recreation), Jane Lynch (Glee), Ken Marino (Children's Hospital), Ryan Hansen (Veronica Mars), Martin Starr (Freaks and Geeks), Lizzy Caplan (Mean Girls, Cloverfield), and many more—yet was canceled after only twenty episodes.

 

3. Veronica Mars (2004–2007)
If any character had a chance to replace Sarah Michelle Gellar's Buffy Summers in my heart, it was Veronica Mars (Kristen Bell), the sharp, cynical, and witty teen detective. The first season follows Veronica as she tries to solve the murder of her best friend, Lilly Kane (Amanda Seyfried), whose death leads not only to Veronica being ostracized by her friends, but also to her father (Enrico Colantoni) losing his job as town sheriff, after he accuses Lilly's powerful father of being involved. Even though many fans tried to save the show from cancellation, the newly formed super channel CW, which had picked up the show from UPN, refused to budge. In a last-ditch attempt to save the show, creator Rob Thomas made a season-four promo, which can be found on YouTube, and takes place years later, with Veronica working for the FBI. Unfortunately, it was not enough to save the show.

 

 

2. Freaks and Geeks (1999–2000)

A cult classic, Freaks and Geeks, created by Paul Feig and executive produced by Judd Apatow, will always be one of the great examples of a show canceled way before its time, to the huge disappointment of its ardent fan base. Eighteen episodes were made but NBC cancelled the show after only twelve episodes. It was because of F&G's fans that NBC released three more episodes in July of 2000. The last three were finally seen on Fox in September of that year when the FOX Family Channel aired F&G in syndication. The show depicts high school life in the eighties for two very different groups of students, as delineated in the title. Although these two groups are very different, the show illustrates how everyone in high school struggles with at least some of the multitude of problems confronted by adolescents. The extremely gifted cast included such stars-in-the-making as James Franco, Linda Cardellini, John Francis Daley, Seth Rogen, and Jason Segel.

 

 

1. My So-Called Life (1994–1995)
My So-Called Life
was a drama series that captured, with unprecedented realism, the turmoil teenagers face as they struggle to understand themselves and the people and events that are a part of their world. Protagonist Angela Chase was brought to life brilliantly by Claire Danes, in a star-making role. The show lasted just nineteen episodes before it was canceled. What was most difficult about the show's cancellation was that it was due to Danes's decision to concentrate on her film career, which, as a Claire Danes fan, I am thankful for, but at the same time I am sad that My So-Called Life never went beyond one season.

 

Northwest Noir

$
0
0

The Paley Center's January 21 Portlandia panel was a hoot, thanks to panelists Fred Armisen and Carrie Brownstein and moderator Julie Klausner. But what particularly strikes me about the show is its entire construction on the characterization of a city, Portland, Oregon, which—since I never do any work I don't have to—I will describe by pilfering from my always-eloquent colleague Arthur Smith, who interprets Portlandia's Portland as a "smug, humorless bastion of leftist ideology and ‘organic' obsessed neo-hippies." Portland isn't so much a character in Portlandia, but rather the character of Portlandia.

I've never stepped foot in Portland, though I have been to San Francisco, Seattle, and Vancouver, and I'll say this: there's something about the Pacific Northwest that speaks to my condition. Sadly, I think it might be the relentless rain and chill. Writing in the New York Times in 1991, Timothy Egan called soft drizzle "the basic lubricant of life in the Northwest." San Diego devitalizes me; Alcatraz had me juiced for days. Go figure.

Egan's Times article, "Northwest Noir: An Art of the Serious Goofy," asserted the existence of a "Northwest noir"—films, TV series, books, music, paintings, even comic strips—either filmed or set in the region or created by people deeply influenced by their experiences there. Egan's focus was on the idiosyncratic aspects of this sensibility, particularly the quirkiness of the characters (think Northern Exposure, set in Alaska; shot in Roslyn, Washington), but I am far more intrigued by the darkness, of both the characters and the stories, clearly a metaphorical articulation of the region's mise en scѐne.  

I can identify numerous TV shows filmed or set in these parts that embody this sensibility, including three on the air now: The Killing, Grimm, and Alcatraz (which, though I admire, seems excessively bright). Chris Carter's Millennium, surely one of the darkest shows ever to air on network TV, was set here; The X-Files, also from Carter, filmed in Vancouver during seasons one to five, which—everyone involved in the show will tell you—hugely influenced its ethos.

However, any fan of the dark, twisted TV knows there's one Northwest Noir show that rules them all,  and by that I mean McLean Stevenson's Hello, Larry. (OK I'm kidding, but it was set in Portland and it was frightening). The one show I speak of is Twin Peaks, set in a Washington mill town that not only had been infiltrated by a disembodied evil spirit who went around invading people's bodies and committing all sorts of unspeakable mayhem, but also was ground zero for the cosmic battle between good and evil because of the existence of something called The Black Lodge, buried deep beneath the surface its towering forest of majestic Douglas firs. The coffee, however was damn fine. 

Here, then, is my personal list of ten favorite TV shows set in the Pacific Northwest (warning: Frasier and Grey's Anatomy are not my cup of tea):

1. Twin Peaks 

2. Millennium

3. Parenthood

4. Have Gun - Will Travel

5. The Night Strangler (TV movie)

6. Northern Exposure

7. Dark Angel

8. The Killing 

9. Alcatraz

10. The Streets of San Francisco/Ironside (tie)

Ethics 101, "Walking Dead" Style

$
0
0

I'm fully aware that zombies are hideous and obtuse, and I get why some people persist in belittling them in comparison with the charisma-drenched vampire, but if you are allowing this anti-zombie bias to keep you from watching AMC's The Walking Dead, you are making a grave mistake (pun, sadly, intended). I enjoy a good blood-sucker yarn as much as anyone, but vampire stories seem stale to me  these days, obsessed with young, tortured love (Twilight, The Vampire Diaries, True Blood). Let's get real here: there's only one Buffy (well, actually two and counting, but you get the point). The creative team behind TWD exploits the horror genre for a far more fulfilling experience, both intellectually and emotionally, repeatedly challenging us to reassess our notions of right and wrong as we ponder the moral implications of the actions of these characters, who are reinventing their own moral codes while struggling to survive in a post-apocalyptic, zombie-infested world.

Herein I explore three of these Walking Dead ethical quandaries, all from the second season, and then render judgment.

I encourage you to agree or, better yet, disagree, but be forewarned:
SPOILERS ABOUND.

1) The Shane-Otis Affair: Shane and Otis head to a FEMA command post in search of medical supplies for Carl (Rick and Lori's young son), who, having been accidentally shot, verges on death. There, they are attacked by a herd of walkers (Walking Dead speak for zombies); Shane injures his ankle trying to escape, but Otis comes to his rescue. Shane urges Otis to go on ahead without him, to make sure the supplies safely reach the farm, but Otis refuses. Nearly out of ammunition, and convinced the walkers are about to overtake them, Shane uses his last bullet to shoot Otis in the knee, so that the walkers will stop chasing him long enough to feast on Otis, thus saving not only his own life, but also Carl's.

Judgment: Tough one. How can you condone Shane's decision to sacrifice another human life, especially when Otis had declined to do the same? On the other hand, the fact that Shane had urged Otis to leave without him is convincing evidence that Shane's primary concern was not his own life, but Carl's. And in the end Shane does in fact save Carl's life, by returning to the farm with the supplies. So, if anyone should get off Shane's back it's Lori, whose relentless vilification of him is, I suspect, motivated less by righteous indignation than by a nagging fear that the child she is carrying is not Rick's, but Shane's. Several episodes later, while discussing Otis, Rick seems to absolve Shane of blame, saying that he would do anything to protect his family. Wonder what Lori would have to say about that.

2) The Barnyard Massacre: Turns out Hershel had been secretly harboring walkers, rather than killing them, by stashing them away in his barn, hoping a cure would be found and that all of these poor undead souls would one day be restored to their normal selves (motivated, in no small part, by the fact that his wife and stepson are among them). To which we say: "Sucker!" When Rick and the other survivors learn of this, the group is predictably split. Some, like Rick and Lori, are so desperate to not have to move on again (especially now that Lori is pregnant) that they are ready to buy in; at one point we even see Rick and Hershel on one of these "hunting" expeditions, grabbing two walkers around the neck with something resembling a Gopher handy helper, and then walking them toward the barn. Shane, of course, sees this as utter folly, and makes his point emphatically by shooting one of these lassoed walkers point-blank in the head, right in front of Hershel.  He then marches over to the barn, opens the door, and unloads his weapon on the emerging walkers, with help from several of his fellow survivors. This scene is particularly traumatic because the "victims" include not just Hershel's wife and stepson, but also Sophia, the young daughter of Carol, another of the survivors, whom the group had just spent I don't know how many episodes searching for after she disappeared in the woods.

Judgment: No-brainer. They're zombies. Their one desire is to eat you. Kill ‘em all!




3) The Execution:
Bummed by the barnyard massacre, Hershel heads into town, looking to tie one on.  Rick and Glenn take off after him, and track him down at a bar (abandoned, of course). Two men arrive; they too are survivors, and request safe haven at Hershel's farm. Rick, feeling threatened, rebuffs them (never mind the ethical issue this raises -- i.e., whether Rick was acting justly in turning them down; we have bigger fish to fry). A gun battle ensues; the two men die. Their compatriots turn up, which leads to a second, noisier gun battle, alerting a herd of walkers. The dead men's colleagues beat a hasty retreat, leaving behind an injured colleague, a young man named Randall. Rick, unwilling to leave Randall for the walkers to feast on, brings him back to the farm, causing much chagrin among the survivors, who fear his friends will come looking for him. After much deliberation and debate, the decision is made to execute Randall. Rick is convinced this is the right thing to do. Lori, wimp that she is, supports Rick, whatever his decision. So does almost everyone else. Dale, God bless him, is appalled - civilization as they know it may be dead, but that doesn't mean humaneness has to die with it. Andrea, being possibly the coolest member of the gang, eventually comes around to Dale's way of thinking.

But Rick is stubborn. They bring Randall to the barn and place him on his knees. Rick puts a gun to his head, and is about to pull the trigger when Carl shows up, urging his dad to blow Randall's head off. Rick, horrified at the example they are setting for his son, halts the execution.

Judgment: Obviously, Dale was right all along. Unfortunately, his reward for this is being eaten by a walker. His defense of humanity may have been brilliant, but his decision to take a nocturnal walk alone in the woods in a television show about zombies is sheer idiocy.

 










Watch a clip of our The Walking Dead panel at PALEYFEST2011!

   

 

Rogues' Gallery

$
0
0

This is Heroes & Villains Week over at Jen's Book Thoughts, wherein bloggers are invited to write about their favorite good guys and bad guys. Guess which one I chose.

Herein I identify eight of my favorite TV black-hats of all time. I in no way intend for this list to be definitive or comprehensive, and I really would love to hear your nominations. I find myself regrettably compelled to omit certain shows from consideration — like The Wire, for instance because the idea of referencing any of those characters as villains seems a gross oversimplification (excepting perhaps a less nuanced psycho like the Greek, from season two). The whole point of The Wire is that we are all victims of institutional abandonment anyway, right?

Here, then, my list of transgressors:

The Cigarette-Smoking Man (William F. Davis, The X-Files): This diabolical Morley-smoking monster was conspiring with aliens to develop a hybrid slave race, while at the same time - covering his butt, you might say -- allowing his wife to be used as a guinea pig in experiments aimed at developing a serum to eradicate the invaders. While some might consider that a full slate, the CSM was also regularly undermining Dana Scully and Fox Mulder, his biological son (shades of Darth Vader!), in their efforts to expose the extraterrestrial conquistadors. In the impossibly intricate X-Files universe, "Cancer Man" was also established as the assassin of both President Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr., and on top of that had absolutely no regard for the dangers of second-hand smoke.

 

BOB (Frank Silva, Twin Peaks): This silver-maned psycho was — if I understand it correctly — in reality a disembodied evil spirit who wreaked havoc on the small Pacific Northwest mill town that lent the show its name, possessing humans and then forcing the host bodies to commit heinous transgressions, like, in the case of Leland Palmer, raping and murdering his daughter Laura. Tragically, when last seen this no-goodnik was inhabiting the body of FBI Special Agent Dale Cooper, who — if I understand it correctly — sacrificed himself for the love of a woman (it being Heather Graham, I totally get it), and whom I like so much I named my dog after.

 

Nina Myers (Sarah Clarke, 24): No one will ever convince me that the best season of 24 wasn't the first, and that the reason for that wasn't the presence of Nina Myers (hmmm ... three negatives in one sentence, and yet ... I think it works). Nina was the mole inside CTU who was abetting Serbian warlord Victor Drazen, yet another in a long line of lunatics limned by Dennis Hooper, in his vendetta against Jack Bauer and David Palmer, but who knew? All along Nina had been super-cool and super-competent, despite the ridiculous amount of strain the CTU crew was under. Nina's treachery crests with her termination of Jack's wife Teri, portrayed by Leslie Hope, but after watching The River I would have to take Nina's side on that one.

 

Lilah Morgan (Stephanie Romanov, Angel): The collective recurring villain in Angel was this vast law firm called Wolfram & Hart (two of whose members, incidentally, wound up as castaways on Lost, which featured a pretty compelling villain of its own: the Man in Black, aka Smoke Monster), and while some will argue that this coveted slot should go to W&H as a whole — or perhaps to Darla or Daniel Holtz — Lilah, though thoroughly human, was as cold and cunning as they come; when Cordelia brands her a "vicious bitch," Lilah nonchalantly replies, "So, you know me."  Lilah's third/fourth-season affair with Wesley, who is filled with remorse after being bumped from Angel's inner circle, is textbook self-destructive behavior (on both ends), with Lilah constantly rubbing Wes's self-hatred and guilt in his face, and their "sweet nothings" are priceless: "Don't be thinking about me when I'm gone," Lilah says after getting the boot from Wesley's bed and home. "I wasn't thinking about you when you were here," he replies. Lilah's last-known address: hell, literally.

 

Natalie Davis, aka "The Miniature Killer" (Jessica Collins, CSI: Crime Scene Investigation): CSI excels at serial killers — Paul Millander, Doctor Dave, the Dick and Jane Killer — but there's something unique about this loony tune, who left behind dioramas of her crime scenes while bedeviling Grissom and gang over the entire course of season seven. Natalie's issues surfaced early: when six, she flung her little sister to her death from a tree house; as their bereft father, a ventriloquist who performs as the Great Rainone, scrubs his little girl's blood from the sidewalk, the camera takes in the scene from Natalie's viewpoint high up in the tree, rendering everything in miniature.  

 

Boyd Crowder (Walton Goggins, Justified): White supremacist ... Christian militiaman ... coal miner ... coal company goon ... crime boss ... will the real Boyd Crowder please stand up? As with Shane Vendrell in The Shield, another morally dubious character, Goggins imbues this Kentucky-fried rooster with so much charisma that resistance is completely futile, particularly in scenes involving Boyd and Deputy U.S. Marshall Raylan Givens, his one-time friend and long-time nemesis, and a man with considerable charm himself. Boyd's plans are forever being thwarted, but he's no dummy, as Raylan's boss Art Mullen points out in the season-three finale when Boyd — in the process of being arrested for murder — perceptively deduces that the U.S. Marshall's Office is participating in the collar to dispel any notion that he and Raylan are "in cahoots."  "You're not as dumb as you look," Art tells him. "Like the use of the word 'cahoots,' though."  

 

Henry Elsworth Ross/Charlie Strom (two Lee Marvin villains, from Dragnet and Ernest Hemingway's The Killers): Marvin was such a bad dude that he merits double-mention, once for his depiction of sociopathic serial killer Ross, who characterizes murder as "a real small thing" while nonchalantly confessing his sins to Joe Friday in between bites of a vegetable burger at Helga's Health Shop, and once as hit man Strom in the 1964 version of The Killers (intended to be the first TV movie, except that NBC refused to air it), in which he and Clu Gulager famously dangle Angie Dickinson by her feet from a high-rise window. Marvin's Strom accomplishes one of the giant feats of movie history: terminating the acting career of Ronald Reagan, whose character is gun downed by Strom and who never again acted (professionally, at least).

Where Have You Gone, Mr. Slattery? (Part One)

$
0
0

Guest blogger Dr. Joseph Harder is an adjunct professor of political science at Macomb Community College and other institutions in Michigan.

The annals of American television are full of "brilliant but canceled" TV shows. These short-lived, often little-known shows attracted loyal cohorts of dedicated fans, and were highly praised by critics, but have never been officially released on DVD. Many are available in cheap, sometimes shoddy bootleg versions; others seem to have utterly vanished. There is one "missing" show that is especially fascinating to reconsider during this presidential-election year. There have very few good television shows about politics, and this particular show was one of the best, surpassed only perhaps by the more famous The West Wing. It was highly praised by both television critics and politicians. It boasted superb writing, first-rate directing, and an impressive array of guest stars, and starred one of television's most popular and enduring performers, who, late in his fifty-year career, opined that his acting on this show was the best he had ever done. 

Despite these credentials, the show is now almost forgotten—and for a very good reason. After its initial airing in the mid-1960s, it was never rerun in this country—not on TV Land, not on Trio, not on Retro or Antenna—and it has never been officially released on DVD. Even bootleggers do not have more than a few episodes. Aside from these copies and a handful of others in the archives of institutions like the Paley Center, the series is unavailable for viewing. Its thirty-two episodes molder in the CBS archives, along side such other "brilliant but canceled" shows as East Side/West Side, The Great Adventure, and The Trials of O' Brien. The name of the show was Slattery's People, and its odd history and odder fate are worthy of examination.

The early sixties witnessed many "new frontier" dramas, featuring new and unconventional heroes and heroines: psychiatrists, professors, nurses, high school teachers, social workers—even a pair of drifters in a red Corvette. Slattery's People was one of the last of these dramas, created by one of the most gifted and underrated talents in television history, James E. Moser. Moser started in radio, and was later Jack Webb's top writer on Dragnet. He went on to create television's first realistic medical dramas, Medic and Ben Casey, thus fashioning the template for later series ranging from Medical Center to St. Elsewhere to House. In 1962, apparently inspired by the popularity of the best-seller Advise and Consent, and Billy Lee Brammer's acclaimed novel of the Texas legislature, The Gay Place, Moser decided to create a television drama about a state legislator. A stickler for detail, Moser spent nine months in Sacramento witnessing the state assembly—then run by the legendary Jesse Unruh (pictured right)—in action. He interviewed dozen of politicians, including "Big Daddy" Unruh himself.  At first, Moser thought of calling his show "The Legislator." It would center on a true "new frontier" hero, a sort of political Ben Casey, a sometimes abrasive, wily, and resourceful yet genuinely idealistic, crusading politician, the minority leader of a state legislature. He knew whom he wanted to play the show's hero, and it was an unconventional choice: Richard Crenna (pictured above), then known primarily as a comic performer on Our Miss Brooks and The Real McCoys.

To enhance the show's authenticity, Moser and producer Matthew Rapf got permission to shoot the pilot in the California State House. The first day of filming was November 22, 1963. Crenna never forgot how, in the middle of filming, a Capitol security guard came up to him, telling that President Kennedy had just been shot. Crenna's initial reaction was, "Hey, that's not in the script." Filming was promptly suspended, and for the rest of day the cast and crews received the terrible bulletins from Dallas.

By the time the show premiered in September 1964, the title had been changed. "The Legislator" was too bland. Crenna's character was named Slattery (no first name until the second season, when it was revealed as James), and almost every episode centered on Slattery's dealings with the people of his district and his fellow legislators. So the show was renamed Slattery's People. Every episode title was in the form of question: "What Is Truth ?", "When Do They Hang the Good Samaritan?", "Do You Remember the Dark Sins of Youth?" Every episode began with Slattery paraphrasing Churchill: "Democracy is a very bad form of government, but I ask you never to forget, all the others are so much worse."

From the beginning, almost all major TV critics loved the show. Despite competing with The Alfred Hitchcock Hour and (ironically enough) Ben Casey, it developed a loyal fan base, including the mother of the writer of this essay. (I could not watch it myself, as it was on at 10pm, and I was six at the time.) It was a show of integrity, directed with integrity, written with integrity, and acted with integrity. In addition, Crenna said that few shows of its time looked as good. The writers, led by Moser, were among the best in the business. The directors included Sydney Pollack, Richard Sarafian, and Lamont Johnson. Guest stars ranged from Elsa Lanchester to Ed Wynn.

The show tackled major social and political issues, including some that were rare for television: wiretapping, good Samaritan laws, drug addiction, corruption in boxing, zoning laws—all were turned into the stuff of high drama. While Rapf and Moser were both liberals, the show tried to be fair to conservatives as well. Slattery often took "liberal" stands, to be sure, but he could defend the rights of property owners with all the fervor of a Republican.

Sadly, the acclaimed show lagged in the ratings, especially after its time slot was changed and it was put opposite The Man from U.N.C.L.E. At the end of the 1964 season, CBS head James Aubrey, the "smiling cobra," announced that it was being canceled. However, it was only the beginning of the Slattery saga. The story was about to get even more interesting. But that will have to wait for part two of this essay.

In the meantime, enjoy this clip from the episode, "Do You Remember the Dark Sins of Youth?":

 

Where Have You Gone, Mr. Slattery? (Part Two)

$
0
0

In part two, guest blogger Dr. Joseph Harder continues his look at the 1960s CBS political drama Slattery's People. (Read part one)

In late December 1964, newspapers began running stories that CBS was considering canceling Slattery's People. The resulting criticism, not just from television critics but from the general public as well, was exceptional. CBS programming head Michael Dann said at the time that the network had never seen so much mail accumulate on behalf of a TV series. Hollywood gossip columnist Hedda Hopper, who loved the show, urged readers to write CBS. However, even more important for the show's future, a power struggle was taking place inside CBS, and thereby hangs a tale. 

Someone should do a Mad Men—like show about television in the sixties. There is only one problem: there would have to be a character based on James T. Aubrey, Jr. (pictured below). Aubrey was so incredible in real life that any fictional version would probably seem tame in comparison. The "Smiling Cobra" was a brilliant, hard-working, Princeton-educated, vulgar, Machiavellian, abrasive, and ruthless philistine, whose stated formula for successful television was "Broads, boobs, and fun." He had a knack for picking hit shows—and canceling those he deemed "too highbrow." He disliked Slattery's People as much as he had disliked East Side/ West Side, The Great Adventure, and The Defenders. Aubrey had made CBS the unchallenged king of the Nielsen ratings, but had made many enemies in the process. In addition there were lurid rumors about his private life. In February, the stunning news came that Aubrey had resigned as head of CBS (to be precise, he was "persuaded" to resign) , and that he had been replaced by the obscure John T. Schneider, a far more low-key personality. CBS president Fred Stanton stated that the network wanted to go in a different direction from the one charted by Aubrey. 

Aubrey's downfall, coupled with the public outcry, helped lead to the renewal of Slattery's People (the network had planned to replace it with Coronet Blue, which wound up premiering in 1967). However, the network mandated several changes designed to make the show more "viewer friendly." To begin with, Slattery would now have a first name: Jim. In addition, the theme music would be changed, to something less dissonant. Matthew Rapf was replaced as producer, giving way to Irwin Elfman (though Moser and Crenna remained the show's guiding spirits). Instead of being phrased as questions, most of the episode titles would now be short, punchy, declarative statements. However, the biggest changes were in the show's cast. 

Though Richard Crenna had clearly been the star of the first season, he was backed by a solid supporting troupe. A then little-known actor named Ed Asner  portrayed the skeptical but principled newspaperman Frank Radcliffe. Veteran character actor Tol Avery was cast as Slattery's friendly adversary, House Speaker Bert Metcalf. Slattery's middle-aged secretary, B.J. Clawson, was played by Maxine Stuart, from the Twilight Zone episode "The Eye of the Beholder." Finally, Slattery had a young aide, Johnny Ramos, portrayed by a then-promising-but-now-largely-forgotten actor named Paul Geary (note the Hispanic name; Slattery's People was, among other things, a pioneering show in terms of giving good roles to blacks and Hispanics). Though Asner and Avery were retained for the second season, Stuart and Geary were let go. Slattery now had a younger (and sexier) secretary, Wendy Wendkowski, played by Francine York (pictured right), and a more dynamic (and more obviously Hispanic) aide, Mike Valera (Alejandro Rey). Finally, Slattery was given a steady girlfriend—in the first season, his little black book had been populated by women played by such actresses as Barbara Eden, Joan Blackman, Sally Kellerman, and Elizabeth Allen. Now there was just one: TV anchorwoman Liz Andrews (Kathie Browne, [pictured left] who in 1969 married actor Darren McGavin). 

However, two things did not change: Slattery's People continued to draw much critical  praise, and to tackle controversial issues. "The Unborn," for instance, dealt with abortion (though Moser was a devout Catholic—and the first winner of the Gabriel Award from the Academy of Catholic Broadcast Professionals for "creating shows that uplifted the human spirit"—there was nothing sectarian about the show). Most notably, in the Emmy-nominated "Rally Around Your Own Flag,  Mister," Slattery sent an undercover agent, Stu Burns (Warren Oates), to infiltrate a John Birch–style vigilante group led by a retired admiral (Lloyd Nolan).

Sadly, another thing remained unchanged: the ratings. CBS programmers insisted on keeping the show in its old time slot, opposite The Man from U.N.C.L.E. and The Jimmy Dean Show. The former, especially, was a runaway hit, particularly among younger viewers. This author still remembers how, as a seven-year-old, he would thrill to the adventures of Napoleon Solo and Ilya Kuryakin, and how puzzled he was by his mother's sorrow that he wasn't watching another show. Somehow, despite the bushels of fan letters CBS received on the show's behalf, Slattery's People's Nielsen numbers indicated that nobody was watching. After thirteen episodes, Slattery's People was off the air for good, replaced by The Trials of O'Brien, starring Peter Falk.

Slattery's People, and those associated with it, had an interesting afterlife. Crenna finally won recognition as a serious dramatic actor, as the sucesse de estime that was Slatttery's People soon helped him win complex, meaty, roles in such films as Wait Until Dark and The Sand Pebbles.  Moser created another failed television show, O'Hara, U.S. Treasury, and wrote many excellent scripts for the acclaimed religious anthology show Insight. Ed Asner went on to appear in several television shows more famous than Slattery's People (in fact, Crenna directed his old friend in an episode of Lou Grant).

And what of Slattery's People itself? To say that it has been "forgotten" is an understatement. It is barely mentioned in most histories of television. The Encyclopedia of Television has no entry on it (nor on Moser or Crenna, for that matter) [Slattery's People does have an entry in Total Television, ed.]. It was rerun in many foreign countries in the seventies, sometimes under the auspices of the United States Information Agency, which thought it would help explain American democracy. The Canadians even came up with their own show about a crusading legislator, Quentin Durgens M.P., starring Gordon Pinsent, in 1966. A graduate student at the University of North Carolina named Susan Keith-Lucas wrote a master thesis on Slattery's People, but it dealt only with the first season. (Moser had CBS send her the scripts). The script for the pilot episode, "What is Truth?" can be found in its entirety in an excellent book by Coles Trapnell called Teleplay: An Introduction to Television Writing, available in most college libraries. However, other than that, Slattery's People lives almost entirely in the memories of people fifty and older. Trio never got around to running it as one of their "brilliant but canceled" shows, while as far as TV Land, Retro, and Antenna are concerned, it might as well not exist. A few specialized archives have a couple of episodes, and The Jesse Unruh Center at The University of Southern California shows the pilot every year as part of a teaching seminar for state legislators.

I had heard about Slattery's People for years, in a fragmentary way. Everything I had heard had been excellent. Anyone who bothered to mention it regarded it as an exemplary instance of what television could be, at its best. Finally, a few years ago, I managed to obtain two episodes, "Do You Remember The Dark Sins of Youth ?" (guest-starring Michael Constantine, Arthur Hill, Steve Ihnat, and Joan Blackman) and "When Do They Hang the Good Samaritan?" (with Barbara Eden and Claude Akins), which I often show to my political science students. Most of them are highly impressed (and voice amazement that it is not on DVD), though a few of the younger ones object to watching anything in black and white. All thirty-two episodes remain in the vaults at CBS, in God knows what condition. The Tiffany Network apparently has little interest in releasing Slattery's People or any of their other forgotten classics, on DVD. To paraphrase a more famous television show, there are at least a thousand stories in the annals of network stupidity, and this has been one of them. 



Two episodes of Slattery's People are now available for viewing in the Paley Center's libraries in New York and Los Angeles.

 

"Battleground" and "Veep": Living in a Political World

$
0
0

One of my favorite things to poke fun at (good-naturedly, of course) is what I like to call the Lou Pascal Syndrome, after the Burt Lancaster character in the 1980 film Atlantic City, an aging "nickel-and-dime numbers man" forever lamenting the ramifications of legalized gambling on the title city and pining for the good old days of "rackets, whoring, guns."  "The Atlantic Ocean was something then," Pascal reminisces. "You should have seen the Atlantic Ocean in those days." I can't remember exactly, but I think it looked pretty much the same? So whereas I agree with guest blogger Joe Harden that the sixties drama Slattery's People is a largely forgotten gem, and I concur with most critics that West Wing was inspiring, artfully crafted television (at least while Aaron Sorkin was around), and I was blown away by David Simon's lacerating look at the Baltimore political machine in The Wire, I do feel compelled to point out that some pretty good politically-themed shows are still being produced today, to wit:

Battleground

Hulu's first original scripted series, Battleground debuted online on February 14, 2012, after Fox—which had earlier issued a script commitment—wound up passing on the series. The exec producers include J.D. Walsh, who also created (and had previously been better known as an actor), and Marc Webb, director of the indie film (500) Days of Summer and the new mega-budget Spider-Man reboot; the two grew up friends in Madison, Wisconsin, where the show is set and shot (using the mockumentary style popularized by shows like The Office and Parks and Recreation, which could have wound up in this post as well). Walsh's twenty-minute pilot, shot on a shoestring, was funded by family members, and Hulu touts the show as reflective of the "creativity and vibrancy that exists in the indie film world." Prior to Battleground's premiere, Hulu senior VP of content Andy Forssell  made a curious comment that I'm still endeavoring to wrap my head around: "Nobody's going to dislike this series. They'll either like it or they won't care about it."

I like it, for what it is. Unlike in Sorkin's world, issues are, well, a non-issue; this is character-driven dramedy centering on a group of young, attractive people running the election campaign of a dark-horse Democratic senatorial candidate. I would find the situation slightly more believable if there were even one grizzled vet around. The team is captained by Chris "Tak" Davis (Jay Hayden),  by far the most interesting of the lot, coping as he is with multiple demons, including a reliably unscrupulous dad --  also a political consultant, though far more accomplished than his son (and portrayed by the effortlessly malevolent Ray Wise). What appeals to me particularly about Tak is that he isn't above making some very ethically dubious decisions - both professionally and personally. In other words, he is an imperfect hero. In one episode he makes out with media director K.J. Jamison (Teri Reeves) - even though he's the father of two young girls, struggling to patch up his troubled marriage (not to mention that K.J. is dating his good friend and business partner)  - and then blows up at the poor campaign videographer who inadvertently caught the two on tape.

My favorite Battleground episode: "Flashback" (Number 10), set in 2004, in which Tak helps his satanic pop push the senatorial candidacy of a thoroughly vacuous incumbent named Makers. I love this exchange between the two Davises; Tak is furious at his dad for running a racist attack ad, and at himself for having created it, and here makes a completely futile attempt to reach his father on moral grounds:

Tak: Would you vote for Makers?

Dad: Yes.

Tak: Why?

Dad:  Because, and this is very important for you to understand: He's who's paying us.

Father knows best, huh?

Veep

HBO's Veep is what I would call Seinfeld-ian comedy: you can look all you want for someone to embody the moral core of the show; but you're not going to find him/her. This too then qualifies as anti-Sorkinian political entertainment, since Sorkin's fictional milieu is typically crammed with voices of conscience.  Veep is, however, hilarious, exceedingly gratifying satire, targeting not just Beltway sanctimony (which is, after all, an easy target), but really the darker impulses of human nature in general - narcissism, superficiality, arrogance, cruelty born from self-doubt, etc. Veep stars, appropriately, Seinfeld alum Julia Louis-Dreyfus in the title role, as profane, imperious, and ridiculously insecure Vice President Selina Meyer; it recently concluded its first season - an eight-episode run - and (thank you, HBO) has already been renewed for a second.

As with Battleground, there's an intriguing back story: the show was created by Armando Iannucci, well-known across the pond for his BBC sitcom The Thick of It, also a political satire (Iannucci also wrote the Oscar-nominated screenplay for In the Loop and played a key role in the creation and evolution of Steve Coogan's Alan Partridge character).  A pilot for an Americanized version of The Thick of It was produced in 2007 by Arrested Development's Mitch Hurwitz and Richard Day, but Iannucci hated it and ABC passed, leading to conversations with HBO about developing a new half-hour politically themed satire, which became Veep. Along the line numerous other interesting names became attached, including then-New York Times columnist Frank Rich (exec producer) and cast members Tony Hale (Arrested Development), Matt Walsh (Upright Citizens Brigade), and Anna Chlumsky (Iannucci's In the Loop, but far better known as the child actress who portrayed  Vada Margaret Sultenfuss in the My Girl films from the early nineties).  Hale, as Meyer's obsequious, Radar-like aide Gary, particularly cracks me up; sample dialogue, at a meeting with senators that is embarrassingly under-attended:

Gary: You should mingle. You should definitely --

Selina: Mingle? ... How do you suggest I mingle with this few people? Did Simon mingle with Garfunkel?

Gary: Well, they worked together, they probably socialized together. I'm sure they did, right?

I can appreciate where New York magazine's Matt Zoller Seitz is coming from when he laments Veep as "rather weightless," and argues that "Iannucci has a tactically limited view of political skulduggery, the type showcased in the insufferably cutesy columns of Maureen Dowd," but I would argue that Iannucci had something else in mind, and should be judged on his own terms. This is more human comedy than political comedy -- think of it as a workplace sitcom in the tradition of such vaunted shows as NewsRadio and The Mary Tyler Moore Show. That it is set in the political world is almost irrelevant, at least to me; sure, it may not deliver muscular commentary on the state of American politics, but it's funny and incisive and inspires us (or should inspire us) to look within ourselves and reexamine our values and priorities, and that's good enough for me.


Through the Darkness of Futures Past

$
0
0

In a recent blog post, Television Worth Watching's David Bianculli solicited nominees for favorite "spider web" movies—films that ensnare you time after time, no matter how often you've seen them - and while I came up with Blade Runner and The Usual Suspects off the top of my head, I neglected one of my all-time favorites: the much-maligned Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me, simply because I had completely forgotten about it (I can't remember the last time I came across it on TV). I am doubly inspired to write about it now because August 28 is the twentieth anniversary of the film's U.S. release, although its calamitous world premiere came three months earlier at the 1992 Cannes Film Festival, where the film was literally hissed and booed during the press screening at the Grand Palais; in a subsequent interview with Chris Rodley, Lynch recalled walking into the Cannes press conference "feeling like I was made of broken glass." Roger Ebert excoriated FWWM as "shockingly bad…simple-minded and scornful of the audience" (I love it when critics presume to speak for "the audience"); others summoned forth adjectives like "lurid," "shock-crazy," "gratuitous," "ugly," "sophomoric"—really, no affront seemed too extreme (though the French and Japanese dug it).

By the time Fire Walk with Me rocked Cannes, Twin Peaks the TV series had been dead for close to a year, and despised by critics for even longer (heaven help the showrunner who doesn't solve a murder mystery when the critics demand it). FWWM is the back story, focusing first on the murder of Teresa Banks, a seventeen-year-old drifter, in Deer Mountain, Washington, and then on the run-up to Laura Palmer's death, which is where the series itself begins. True, the film is transgressive and abstruse, but also completely compelling both emotionally and intellectually, and just a devastating portrait of a tormented young women desperate for salvation. One of the more eloquent defenses of it I have come across is from Al Strobel, the actor who portrayed the inhabiting spirit Mike (embodied in the one-armed shoe salesman Gerard, in a nod to The Fugitive) in both the film and the series, which I came across in the 2011 paperback edition of David Lynch: Beautiful Dark by Greg Olson, film curator for the Seattle Art Museum (The Scarecrow Press, Inc.): "Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me is hard to look at if you're not prepared to look at a work of art. It's like going to a gallery and seeing extremely expressionistic paintings when you were expecting English landscapes. This was more a piece of art than a movie. The juxtaposition of horror and beauty has an elevating sense that brings out things in your mind and in your heart and in your soul like a very fine piece of art does. The critics didn't see that…

Nor audiences: Fire Walk with Me tanked at the box office, very likely exterminating any chance of another chapter in the Twin Peaks saga (never say never). The summer of '92 was dismal for Lynch for another reason; On the Air, a sitcom he produced with Mark Frost (his partner on the TV version of Twin Peaks, though not the film) debuted on ABC on June 20, ran for three episodes (out of order), and was abruptly, well, off the air, canceled by the network, a crying shame if you ask me. Set backstage at a live TV variety show in 1957 on the second-rate (speaking generously) Zoblotnick Broadcasting Corporation, On the Air was a My Favorite Year-ish broad, zany comedy, and while I confess to loving almost anything Lynch does, I do have in my corner TV Guide's Jeff Jarvis, who called it "militantly, stubbornly weird…like a bad dream brought on by KGB pharmaceuticals" (intended as a compliment—honestly).

In May 1992, the Paley Center (then The Museum of Television & Radio) hosted an evening with the cast and creative team of On the Air. Lynch had to be satellited in from Paris, where he had stopped en route to Cannes for the premiere of Fire Walk with Me. He was in high spirits, and quite mischievous. The darkness of futures past lay ahead. Check out this clip from the event, in which Lynch interacts with the commendably poised Susan Fisher, a Paley Center VP at the time:

 

   

 

Book 'Em!

$
0
0

A couple of interesting TV-themed books came across my desk recently:

Fans of fifties sci-fi B-movies—and really, who isn't?—will want to acquaint themselves with Science Fiction Theatre, a largely forgotten syndicated half-hour anthology show that ran for two seasons and is now the subject of an impressively researched book  (Science Fiction Theatre: A History of the Television Program, 1955-57; 2011, BearManor Media) by the heavily credentialed Martin Grams, Jr. (I Led 3 Lives, Suspense: Twenty Years of Thrills and Chills, The Radio Adventures of Sam Spade, many others), with contributions by Patrick Lucanio and Jim Cox. The program is commonly dubbed "semi-documentary," though I prefer host Truman Bradley's on-air description, delivered from the specially constructed science lab he appears in at the open and close of each episode: "a tale of fiction, from the borderlands of science." Topics ranged from time travel ("Time Is Just a Place," based on a short story by Jack Finney, author of The Body Snatchers, source of the great paranoid thriller Invasion of the Body Snatchers) to telepathic chimps ("Conversation with an Ape") to the mysteries of the Pyramids ("The Stones Began to Move," starring Basil Rathbone).

Sounds exotic, but production values are—how shall I say?—"cheap," with lots of stock footage, and the scripts are chatty and action-light, a situation Variety was constantly bemoaning, according to the reviews reprinted in Grams's book. Still, the episodes are completely irresistible, thanks in no small part to producer Ivan Tors (pictured left), a Hungarian who fled the rising tide of Naziism in 1939 and eventually settled in Hollywood, where he cowrote and produced a trio of low-budget sci-fi films (The Magnetic Monster, Riders to the Stars, Gog) that became known as his Office of Scientific Investigation (OSI) trilogy, and where he later produced such TV shows as Sea Hunt, Daktari, and Flipper. Tors's fellow Hungarian and frequent collaborator Curt Siodmak (who had scripted The Wolf Man and I Walked with a Zombie) started out as director of the pilot, but he and Tors argued so bitterly that he was eventually supplanted by Herbert L. Strock.

Science Fiction Theatre was among the titles churned out by Frederic W. Ziv, the so-called father of syndication, also responsible for The Cisco Kid, Highway Patrol, and the notorious red-baiting I Led 3 LivesZiv was so renowned for penny-pinching that he formed a subsidiary company titled Economee TV, and it shows. We can't imagine he's be too thrilled by YouTube posting full episodes of Science Fiction Theatre on line, but nonetheless:


 

Any opportunity to revisit television's classic "oaters" is a good one as far as I'm concerned, and Alvin H. Marill's Television Westerns: Six Decades of Sagebush, Sheriffs, Scalawag, and Sidewinders (2011, The Scarecrow Press, Inc.) had me digging through the Paley Center archives (one of the many advantages of working here) in a welcome trip down memory lane.

Marill, who passed away in 2010, previously authored such tomes as Keeping Score: Film and Television Music, 1988-1997 and Movies Made for Television, 1964-2004. Here, the river is wide but not so deep: Television Westerns is essentially a survey tracing small-screen horse operas from the medium's earliest days (film transfers like Hopalong Cassidy, radio migrants like The Lone Ranger and Gunsmoke ) through the boom years of the late fifties/early sixties (covered in a chapter titled "From Wagon Train and Bonanza to The Virginian and The Big Valley) and right up to the present (including David Milch's profane Deadwood and Elmore Leonard's sublime Justified). Separate chapters look at telemovies, miniseries, and cartoons, plus western-themed episodes of nonwestern skeins, so that you get a couple of lines on "The Gunslinger" from The Dick Van Dyke Show and "Spectre of the Gun" from Star Trek—the operative phrase being  "couple of lines," since, again, depth isn't the point.

If you're old enough to remember television's classic westerns in their initial go-rounds, you likely have your own favorite—mine being Rod Serling's The Loner. My favorite fun facts from Marill, however,  regard CBS's Cimarron Strip which ran for one measly season (1967–68) but distinguished itself with a Jack the Ripper–themed episode ("Knife in the Darkness") penned by Harlan Ellison and scored by Bernard Herrmann (well-known for his film work with Alfred Hitchcock and Orson Welles, though he also contributed to The Twilight Zone and other TV shows), in which U.S. Marshall Jim Crown (Stuart Whitman) prowls the fog-engulfed town searching for a serial killer of "saloon girls," delivering portentous lines like "This fog—it's strange weather" and "I'm just trying to tell you there's a special kind of maniac loose in Cimarron."  

For more on this episode, lookee here. Or, you can watch the whole thing on YouTube, starting here:

100 Great Episodes: Doctor Who

$
0
0

When I was program director at TV Land we collaborated with TV Guide on a special issue titled "100 Greatest Episodes of All Time," published in June 1997. Being the rigid literalist that I am, the concept was anathematic to me, since no one can justifiably identify the 100 greatest episodes of all time without having seen every episode of every program ever made, though you know where that argument got me. (For the record, the number-one episode was "Chuckles Bites the Dust" from The Mary Tyler Moore Show; I have no recollection of whether I concurred, but I certainly have the utmost admiration and respect for the episode.)   

Anyway, what we were really identifying were the favorite episodes of everyone in the room (along with an effective means of generating attention and thus promoting our two brands). Now that I am no longer obligated to sublimate my opinion for the greater good, I'm determined to identify my 100 favorite episodes of all time, even if it takes the rest of my life to do so. I will be revealing these selections from time to time as mood and opportunity arise and—this part is especially important—in no particular order, so that the episode I'm about to anoit doesn't necessarily rank first or one-hundredth or anywhere specific in between; rather, it just ranks.

So, without further fuss ...

Series Title: Doctor Who

Episode Title: "The Empty Child"/"The Doctor Dances" (2005).
(I cheat a wee bit here because these are technically two episodes, though part and parcel of a single arc, so it seems unfair to halve them.)

Key Personnel: The Doctor is the ninth doctor, portrayed by Christopher Eccleston. It is said that your first Doctor, like your first Bond, will always be your favorite, and you'll get no lip from me. He is accompanied here of course by Rose Tyler (Billie Piper), the Buffy Summers–inspired London shop girl and the only regular companion Eccleston had during his single season on the show. The heavily credentialed Steven Moffat (Coupling, Sherlock, The Adventures of Tintin) scripted both episodes, in his pre-showrunner days. These episodes also mark the debut of the swaggering Captain Jack Harkness (John Barrowman), introduced here as an intergalactic conman, though his heroic instincts are already apparent and great things lie in store for him as the protagonist of the Doctor Who spinoff Torchwood.

Plot: The TARDIS (the Doctor's time/space-traveling machine) pursues an extraterrestrial cylinder back in time to 1941 London, the height of the blitz. The city is being terrorized by a band of zombie-like creatures whose faces are mysteriously transformed into gas masks made not of leather or some synthetic material, but of human flesh and bone (or, as the Doctor puts it: "Human DNA is being rewritten, by an idiot"). Jack, a 51st Century Time Agent, is posing as an American volunteer captain in the Royal Air Force, and has tricked the TARDIS into pursuing the cylinder to London, hoping to scam the Doctor and Rose into ponying up big bucks for it under the mistaken belief that it is a Chula warship (when in fact it is only a Chula ambulance, though in no way the worthless piece of junk Jack believes it to be).

How Do I Love Thee?: Let me count the ways:

1) Many Who aficianados rank these as the spookiest episodes ever produced, and they get no argument from me. Both unfold entirely over the course of a single night, with director James Hawes incorporating elements of both noir and horror. Certain moments (like Dr. Constantine's transformation, pictured right) are spine-chilling, even watched in broad daylight. But for my money the most terrifying scene occurs in Room 802 of Albion Hospital when the Doctor, Rose, and Jack come to the sudden realization that the rattling of the tape recorder means the tape has ended, so the little-boy zombie leader is no longer speaking via a recording but is right there in the room with them. "Are you my Mummy?" indeed!

2) Though especially dark and foreboding, the episodes sparkle with wit -- even laugh-out-loud humor -- much of it via the romantic tension generated as Jack and the Doctor compete for Rose's affection (or are they competing just because their male egos demand it?). We're talking major double-entendre action: Moffat himself has commented that the word "dance" is a metaphor for sex, and there's a hilarious scene in which Jack ridicules the Doctor's iconic sonic screwdriver ("Who looks at a screwdriver and thinks, ‘Ooh, this could be a little more sonic'?") that has everything to do with tools but nothing to do with screwdrivers.

3) Still, the real payoff here comes in the quieter scenes, like when Eccleston converses with a cat or lauds the spirit of "one tiny, damp little island" that stood up to Hitler's war machine, and of course the dancing scenes themselves. Here's where Eccleston distinuishes himself as the definitive Doctor, at least for me. Yes, he can be as manic and heroic an any Doctor, but I particularly admire his depth, introspection, and tenderness. There's a truly great scene early in part two where Rose tells the Doctor that she trusts Jack because "he's like you, except with dating and dancing." When the Doctor protests that "You just assume I don't dance," Rose replies: "What, are you telling me you do dance?" "Nine hundred years old, me," the Time Lord says. "I've been around a bit. I think you can assume, at some point, I danced." Rose tries to coax a two-step out of the Doctor to Glenn Miller's "Moonlight Serenade" (this is 1941), but he's too distracted with the challenge at hand, and eventually their quiet little moment is interrupted by Jack's return. Stick around to the end, though, and watch the Doctor and Rose hoof it up to "Boogie Woogie Bugle Boy," which has to be one of the greatest Doctor Who scenes ever.  

Say What?: Lots of great quotes here, like Rose telling the Doctor "I think you're experiencing Captain envy" or lamenting that he doesn't use more high-tech alien gadgetry with the line "Give me some Spock, for once. Would it kill you?" or the Doctor commenting thusly on a young woman's plan to feed the homeless children of London by slipping into temporarily abandoned homes during air raids and divvying up the food: "It's brilliant! I'm not sure if it's Marxism in action or a West End musical." One of the funniest exchanges occurs when the Doctor, Rose, and Jack are on the run from the little-boy zombie, and Jack reaches into his pocket for his sonic blaster but pulls out a banana instead (long story).

The Doctor: "Go, now! Don't drop the banana!"

Jack: "Why not?"

The Doctor: "Good source of potassium!"

So that's my argument for "The Empty Child"/"The Doctor Dances." Whovians, did I pick the right episodes?

(My thanks to intern Diantha Vliet for finding all of the great video and still images you see in this post.)


Doctor Who at the Paley Center in NY

See screenings of classic Doctor Who at the Paley Center:
Oct. 27, Nov. 24, Dec. 29.

Don't Cry for Me, Sam Hunter

$
0
0

Now that Homeland has jumped the shark (as if I needed another reason to ignore the Golden Globes), I proffer an alternative for fans of espionage dramas: Hunted.

Never heard of it, right? Sigh. Hunted is (was?) an exceptionally dark and unobtrusive British-American series airing on Cinemax here and on BBC One across the pond. Season one—comprising eight episodes—ran in the fourth quarter of 2012; season two now appears endangered—the BBC has retreated, leaving Cinemax on the prowl for a new partner. 

Bummer. Let's all write Cinemax and save the show.

Three things to establish upfront about Hunted:

1) It was created by Frank Spotnitz, forever in my pantheon for his eight years with The X-Files (four as exec producer). Spotnick has participated in several Paley Center panels over the years, all viewable in our libraries. Read more. 

2) It stars Melissa George, the Australian actress forever in my pantheon for her portrayal of Lauren Reed on Alias (plus, she was once nice to my daughter at a Starbucks). 

3) It also stars Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje, forever in my pantheon for his portrayal of Mr. Eko in Lost (yes, he appeared on Oz too, but why would I have watched that?).

The remainder of the cast is likely less familiar to American TV viewers, despite the presence of such Brit legit thesps as Tony winner Stephen J. Dillane (Tom Stoppard's The Real Thing), who also limns the dour Iron Throne aspirant Stannis Baratheon on HBO's Game of Thrones.

Spotnitz's imprint is all over Hunted, but especially revealing is the impossibly intricate conspiracy plot at the core of the story. Sound familiar, anyone? Only this one involves not extraterrestrials and well-coiffed middle-aged white folk with deceptively bland appellations like The Cigarette-Smoking Man and the Well-Manicured Man, but rather (SPOILER ALERT!) a cabal of multinational corporations known as Hourglass, plotting not only to accumulate boundless power and wealth—through whatever means necessary—but also, for some reason we've yet to learn, to execute George's character, Sam Hunter. I just eat this stuff up.

Here's what most intrigues me about Hunted, despite some rather unfortunate plausibility issues: Typically, TV spies are fundamentally honorable (if conflicted) G-(wo)men risking their lives for freedom, democracy, yada yada yada, but in Hunted we're presented with an altogether variant species: private security contractors working for a shady corporation called Byzantium, whose clients are known only to their boss, the slithery Rupert Keel (Dillane) - one MI-6 operative alludes to them, not inaccurately, as "quasi-criminal mercenaries." In season one, that client turns out to be (SPOILER ALERT!) Polyhedrus, a truly odious conglomerate whose primary objective is to conceal its role in the mass murder of Pakistani villagers who were obstructing its scheme to reap billions via the construction of a dam.

Particularly stunning is that even after Sam and the Byzantium gang discover Polyhedrus's execrable past, they push forward with the mission—as Keel says, the primary directive is to "complete the op." To this end, they are prepared not only to sacrifice a member of their own crew ("There are circumstances under which any of us can be terminated; Hasan understands that," Akinnuoye-Agbaje's Deacon Crane says), but also to arrange the executions of two innocent people rather than risk derailment of the task at hand. This assignment falls ultimately to Crane, portrayed as a pious man who makes periodic Scully-like visits to church to light candles and consult with his priest about the horrific acts he is about to commit, then goes ahead and commits them anyway.

These are, I should clarify, the heroes of our story.

I should in fairness add that Crane and Keel (SPOILER ALERT!) appear to undergo a crisis of conscience at the very end of season one, finally breaking with their client, to save Sam's life.

One could posit that this is just the latest mutation in post-Sopranos/post-The Shield "heroism," but that's a subject for another post (ha ha!). Hunted reminds me a bit of AMC's unfortunately short-lived Rubicon (2010), another espionage drama that was uncompromisingly complex and aloof, though—in my opinion and the opinion of about three other TV viewers in the entire country—thoroughly compelling, and also of Smith (2006–2007), another regrettably short-lived drama, from CBS, about a gang of professional thieves. Loved it!

And wait ... I haven't even gotten to the best part: Despite enduring Job-proportion misfortune - her mom's slaying, her own kidnapping, her betrayal by a Byzantium colleague, resulting in her own near-death and the loss of her unborn baby, and on and on and on - Sam doesn't shed a single tear until - by my count - episode five, and only once after that.

Are you listening, Carrie? 


Addendum: I must be awfully good at spotting talent. Kudos to two of my former assistants: Wendy Greene. for her appointment to executive producer, programming, at History, and Julie Klausner for this write-up in The New York Times.

Weird Scenes Inside the Gold Mine

$
0
0

Series finales are odd, right? On the one hand, if you like the show enough to stick around until the end, you're probably bummed that it's over. On the other, who doesn't eagerly anticipate the ultimate episode of a favorite series once we know it's coming?

This is a busy season for finales: Gossip Girl, 30 Rock, and Fringe are all already in the bag, with The Office and Breaking Bad pending. Years from now, will anyone ranks these finales among the most monumental—or monumentally disappointing—of all time, along with The Fugitive, The Mary Tyler Moore Show, Newhart, St. Elsewhere, Lost, and The Sopranos (all good in my opinion) or, conversely, Roseanne,  M*A*S*H, Seinfeld, and Battlestar Galactica (all not so good)? Doubtful so far, though I did admire Fringe's finish, confirming that the series was first and foremost about one thing: the profoundly complex and profoundly moving relationship between a father and a son.

Here, in descending order, is my personal list of top-ten series finales of all time (just for the fun of it, see if you can match the final lines at the bottom of this piece with the corresponding series—music and animal sounds not included). 

10 - Star Trek: The Next Generation

9 - The Prisoner

8 - Angel

7 - Buffy the Vampire Slayer

6 - The Shield (pictured right)

5 - Dollhouse

4 - Lost

3 - St. Elsewhere

2 - Twin Peaks

1 - The Sopranos

TV fans love to argue about these kinds of things, so I set out to do just that in the following video with my Paley Center colleague Arthur Smith; Arthur, and I, after all, disagree on just about everything—from the original Star Trek versus Star Trek: The Next Generation to Jack versus Sawyer to Annie versus Britta, and on and on and on.

So imagine my surprise when it turned out we had similar tastes in final episodes ... 

   

 

 

Match These Final Lines from the above Series Finales  

A - "Let's go to work."

B - "We've got time."

C - "How's Annie?"

D - "Five card stud, nothing wild, and the sky's the limit."

E - "We've been waiting for you."

F -- "What are we gonna do now?"

G - "Come on, son, let's go wash our hands, all right?"

H - "I went ahead and ordered some for the table."

I - "Downtown officers need help."

J - "Evacuate!"



Answers

A-8; B-5; C-2; D-10; E-4; F-7; G-3;  H-1; I-6; J-9 

Many thanks to intern Craig Solomon for his research help!

 

No Penguins on the North Pole

$
0
0

I'm probably way too pumped to learn that Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick are crafting a Zombieland pilot for Amazon, which is scheduled to "air" in mid-April and could then go to series.  Not that I feel guilty about liking the 2009 film version of Zombieland (likewise written by Reese and Wernick) - who doesn't? - yet I can't help wondering if it is truly deserving of all the adulation with which I regard it. No matter how many times I've seen Zombieland, I'm always up for another viewing.

This latest Zombieland news got me thinking (never a pleasant thing): What other semi-guilty pleasures would I like to see adapted into television or Internet-based series?

Hence, this list (which also includes projected scenarios):       

1) Pitch Black (2000): Stardom is a double-edged sword, as we know from watching Vin Diesel transmogrify into one (a star, that is). Before The Pacifier (2005) there was Pitch Black (2000), a neat little deep-space thriller in which Diesel portrays Richard D. Riddick, a big, bad wolf en route to the hoosegow when his transport ship crash-lands on a desert planet inhabited by predatory aliens. This film has already spawned one sequel - The Chronicles of Riddick, released in 2004 - with another in the works. But it's time to abandon these pointless little theatrical endeavors and convert Pitch Black into what was really the obvious choice from the get-go: a television series. Since Diesel is way busy these days (think of all those Fast and the Furious sequels still crying to be made), the role of Riddick is offered first to Telly Savalas, who is resurrected through the magic of computer graphics, but holds out (virtually) for an ungodly sum, and the job goes instead to Terry O'Quinn, who is pretty good at this stranded stuff anyway.

2) The Usual Suspects (1995): SPOILER ALERT!!! Boogeyman Keyser Söze, an established master of disguise, was last seen riding into the sunset with good buddy Kobayashi;  here he resurfaces in Washington, D.C., as a devious Southern congressman who not only strangles a dying dog with his bare hands, but also hatches an elaborate plan of revenge after being skipped over for secretary of state, managing to outsmart the president of the United States and every other political shark in the nation's capital with a series of mindbogglingly transparent schemes, in the process forgetting to employ his Southern accent about fifty percent of the time. Devil's greatest trick indeed. 

3) Manhattan Murder Mystery (1993): I love most Woody Allen films (and not just the early, funny ones), though I do admit to experiencing suicidal impulses sitting through September. Not many of Woody's admirers would join me in identifying this riotous little film as among their favorites. MMM, immediately succeeding Husbands and Wives and all of its attendant unpleasantness, paired Allen with onetime flame Diane Keaton and co-scripter Marshall Brickman for the first time in fourteen years (not including Keaton's brief appearance in Radio Days), and certainly evokes Allen's earlier, less complicated work. The premise - Keaton and Allen as amateur middle-aged sleuths investigating the mysterious death of an elderly neighbor (he very reluctantly) - is a perfect setup for a CBS crime series, no? Keaton reprises her role; Allen exec produces, returning to weekly television for the first time in six decades, but declines to co-star, so the part goes instead to Alan Alda, who appears in the film as well, though in a different role. Alternately we see a CW reimagining, starring Blake Lively and Chace Crawford, who are bound to show up in a Woody Allen film one of these days anyway.

4) End of Days (1999): This one I'll admit is purely guilty pleasure, but it's beyond me how anyone can resist Arnold Schwarzenegger as Christ figure/former cop Jericho Cane (JC, get it?), who - God help us - is our last line of defense against Lucifer himself, in the embodiment of a Wall Street banker portrayed by Gabriel Byrne. Satanists abound! (Would be interesting to stage a contest between the devil in this film and Joe Carroll in The Following, to see who boasts more apostles.) The ending - SPOILER ALERT!!! - in which Cane fends off Satan by impaling himself on a sword protruding from the statue of an archangel - would have to be tossed, but so what? It's not like it made any sense anyway. Assuming that Schwarzennger is unavailable - and given The Last Stand I'm not sure he will be - I'm recommending Josh Holloway, formerly Lost's Sawyer, for the role.

5) Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me (1992): This almost universally panned David Lynch film - its entire universe of supporters meets every Wednesday night for pickup basketball, and the best we can do is three-on-three - ends with the corpse of comely high school coed Laura Palmer washing ashore in the fictitious Pacific Northwest mill town after which the film is named - a blatantly obvious launching point for a television series. We envision a mild-mannered man named, say, Pete Martell, happening upon the body while out on a morning fishing trip, and summoning investigators to the scene. Kyle MacLachlan returns in the role of FBI Special Agent Dale Cooper, who sets out to unmask Laura's killer with the help of a local sheriff named after a U.S. president (TBD). If, like us, you are reminded here of the Woody Allen joke in which Gertrude Stein counsels Ernest Hemingway against writing Great Expectations because Charles Dickens already wrote it, all we can say is: "Bring Back Twin Peaks!"

Game of Thrones: The North Remembers

$
0
0

Note from David Bushman: Mother of Mercy, intern Craig Solomon says goodbye to season three of "Game of Thrones" ...

"Here comes the King in the North!" "Here comes the King in the North!"  

These celebratory chants punctuate the nightmare at the beginning of "Mhysa," the Game of Thrones third-season finale on Sunday, June 9. The finale further demonstrates that in Westeros, all certainly is not fair in love and war; this sentiment is "Mhysa"'s most powerful message. Robb Stark, one of the handful of truly noble characters floating among the chaos, sat atop a horse with the head of his beloved dire wolf sewn into his collar bone. Directly across from this profane display sat a pale shell of his sister Arya Stark. This would be their only reunion since Arya departed from Winterfell: the home they shared with a family that is now scattered or deceased. This tragic circumstance, which Game of Thrones illustrates perfectly, culminated the intricate season-long treachery that pulls this fantasy world away from Tolkien and closer to David Simon.

"If you think this has a happy ending, you definitely haven't been paying attention."

We heard this phrase several episodes back when a then-nameless tormenter (eventually revealed to be Ramsay Bolton) had been flaying the finger of Theon Greyjoy, the former Stark protégé. "Mhysa" revealed the strings that made up the web of clouded deception and senseless torture frequently present in the third season. This finale represents the denouement (excuse my eleventh grade English-class terminology) following the infamous "Red Wedding" in the previous episode, "The Rains of Castamere." Shortly after the first season had aired I took a one-way dragon ride across the Narrow Sea and never looked back. Unfortunately, by the time I had reached A Storm of Swords, the third book in George R.R. Martin's magnum opus, there was some rough turbulence near the Gulf of Grief (I should come back to earth sometime soon ...).

If Ned Stark's beheading at the end of the first season (and book) wasn't enough to completely dismiss the concept of honor in Westeros, the vicious slaughter of his son, wife, daughter-in-law, and unborn grandchild at the Red Wedding should firmly cement Martin's cynical disposition. In this world one must throw principles to the wind or perish in the midst of chaos. Robb Stark may have been the undefeated (in battle) Young Wolf, yet he failed to master the Machiavellian principles so relished by his trusted banner man (and murderer) Roose Bolton and his brutal antagonist Tywin Lannister. Bolton's attempt to advise Robb in matters of handling prisoners (something about flayed men having no secrets), and in merciless battle tactics, failed; in his eyes so did "the Young Wolf." Dishonor won Roose Bolton all the power formerly held by the beloved Starks, even though we had only known him as one of Robb's creepy liege lords for two seasons.   

Cruelty appeared to be the central theme of this season. Whether it was slicing off the sword hand of Jaime Lannister, vulgar statements about women in Ancient Valryian, human sacrifice, or losing one's manhood (the list goes on). It's a lion-eat-wolf world out there, with little room for concern for the plight of individuals. However, those who do survive succeed by following pure instinct. Davos Seaworth, the hand of Stannis Baratheon, one of the five kings (now three) fighting in the most senseless civil war since 19th century America, prevents the king from sacrificing the life of a lowborn (also Stannis's nephew) to a deity, the Lord of Light. Stannis is about to behead his old friend, until he receives a new calling from a vision in his unhinged adviser Melissandre's flames. I guess good karma finds some footing within the ways of the old Gods, new Gods, or even this Lord of Light.    

"Mhysa" also succeeds in demonstrating that karma works both ways. The Lannisters, the realm's richest (and sneakiest, according to a GOT super fan played by a convincing Zach Galfinakis on Saturday Night Live's sketch "Game of Game of Thrones") family, have had two members endure overwhelming pain. Near the end of the episode, Jaime Lannister stumbles into the capital donning rags, a full beard, and a butchered stump replacing his legendary sword hand. Jaime, unrecognized, is mistaken for a commoner, yet his arrogance appears to have somewhat evaporated. Jaime has more in common now with our favorite Lannister (the only one with an Emmy), Tyrion, than ever before. Peter Dinkladge's Tyrion may be loved by millions across the globe, but still is ridiculed by the person he works innocently to please: Tywin, the Lannister patriarch, makes it his business to relentlessly ignore the achievements of his younger son; this episode allowed the elder Lannister another opportunity to completely devalue Tyrion's existence. The Lannister name was the only reason Tyrion was not thrown into the sea after his mother died giving birth. When Tyrion painfully started to choke back his tears, he most certainly wasn't alone. 

Game of Thrones is truly not about what name you own or don't, but how you deal with a world that rewards severely misguided ideals. As we discover at the end of the episode, "Mhysa" is Ghiscari for mother, a role achieved by Daenerys Targareyan, one of the frontrunners for the Iron Throne (three hundred years of legacy), whose has emerged as the Harriet Tubman of Essos. The young queen concludes the episode by crowd-surfing among countless freed slaves chanting "Mhysa" while her three legendary dragons decorate the desert sky. 

Even though they live on opposite sides of their world, Daenerys and her Great Uncle Aemon of the Night's Watch are both focused on preserving humanity, but from different perspectives. For the night is dark and full of terrors.


Every Demon Wants His Pound of Flesh

$
0
0

I'd watch anything with Lena Headey (in her company, sure, but what I mean is anything in which she appears), which explains what I was doing at a midtown Manhattan movie theater at 3 pm on Saturday, June 8, waiting for The Purge to roll. Variety tells us this "micro-budgeted scarer ... screamed into theaters with a fantastic $36.4 million domestic start, outdoing even the most ambitious expectations in the $20 million range." I'm telling you The Purge—Lena Headey or not—is a mess. The title of the film—set in America in the year 2022—references the annual government-imposed twelve-hour period during which all crimes—including murder—are sanctioned and unpunishable, in what has turned out to be a phenomenally successful initiative to reduce transgressive behavior over the remaining 8,753.81277 hours of the year.

The Purge may be conceptually sci-fi, but at its core it's stalker-in-the-house, and the most unsettling aspect of my viewing experience was the raucous cheering from the gallery every time one of the intruders got their comeuppance, and by that I mean blown-away, stabbed, or axed to death. Something about applauding the brutality of humankind—self-defense or not—disquiets me. If your thirteen-year-old daughter has plans to see this film, like mine, my advice is, "No way, kidd-o" (channeling Christian Shephard here).

So where am I going with this? Somewhere, trust me, though probably not where you think - I've no new insights into the implications of film and television violence for society. But my Purge experience was fresh in my mind two days later when reading Neil Genzlinger's New York Times review of the BBC2's The Fall, newly available on Netflix, which, as it happens, I had just viewed myself (I'd watch anything with Gillian Anderson). The Fall follows Detective Superintendent Stella Gibson (Anderson), summoned to Belfast, Northern Ireland, to galvanize a murder investigation; in a blink of the eye she establishes that the slaying is the work of a serialist. Genzlinger deems The Fall, "worth a look if you haven't had your fill of cat-and-mouse dynamics. If, on the other hand, you're watching more than two serial-killer series already and feel the need for more, you may want to ask yourself what this says about you."

Uh-oh.

My serial-killer-series count is now up to three—The Fall (season two to come), AMC's The Killing, and NBC's Hannibal (though I draw the line at Dexter). What does that say about me? Am I every bit as sanguinary as the Purge crowd?

Prowling for answers, I turned of course to the Internet (despite persistent fear the FBI would show up at my doorstep, demand my hard drive, and shackle me in chains—yes, I've PRISM on the brain). You know how people caution you never to research medical symptoms on the Internet? Ditto for serial killers. I happened upon a thread titled "I Find Serial Killers Fascinating," with the following post: "Merry Christmas Charles Manson! A few years ago I decided to send Charles Manson a Christmas card. I did it, didn't really think about it, and got no reply. I hadn't expected one." Perhaps if you had wished him a happy Hanukah or Kwanza instead?

There's no shortage of clinical or scholarly explication for our fascination with serial murderers. Within minutes I discovered two college papers; one from Stanford, one from Wesleyan (no slouches there). David Schmid, author of Natural Born Celebrities: Serial Killers in American Culture, argues that: "The existence of famous serial killers in contemporary American culture brings together two defining features of American modernity: stardom and violence." I like that. Schmid posits that, "By either killing the serial murderer or suggesting that the true source of villainy lies elsewhere, these films let their audiences off the hook, letting them enjoy the fame of serial killers within a moralistic framework that relieves them of pursuing the implications of that enjoyment." Some audiences, maybe, but not me.

Pushing on, I discovered the website of Dr. Scott Bonn, professor of criminology, media expert, public speaker, media analyst and commentator, and author, who seems to have carved a career out of being a serial-killer expert. Bonn posits that: "Serial killers elicit a morbid fascination from us that we also have for terrible calamites such as train wrecks and natural disasters. Simply put, we are compelled to understand why serial killers do such horrible things to complete strangers."

Actor Kevin Bacon, aka Ryan Hardy on The Following, Fox's entry in the serial-killer sweepstakes, made a similar point at the June 4 event at the Paley Center; turns out Bacon has himself long been fascinated by serial killers and cults, and here's why:

   


I hesitate to do this, but here's an interview with Richard Ramirez, the recently deceased Night Stalker, on YouTube from Bonn's site. It makes me feel so, I don't know, complicit ... and on the hook.

 

"Difficult" Quiz

$
0
0

With a nod to my colleague Arthur Smith, here are fourteen things I learned from reading Brett Martin's Difficult Men: Behind the Scenes of a Creative Revolution: From The Sopranos and The Wire to Mad Men and Breaking Bad

In keeping with the interactive spirit of our times, you choose the correct answers

Here's Michiko Kakutani's review in The New York Times, but take the quiz first.

Answers appear at the bottom of this post. No cheating!

 


1) David Chase (pictured left) once described which of the following as "the best time of my life"?

A - Producing the first season of The Sopranos

B - Dropping acid and going to see 2001: A Space Odyssey

C - Listening to Andea Bocelli perform "Con te partiro" at the Metropolitan Opera

D - Hanging with Stephen J. Cannell, Steven Bocho, Roy Huggins, and other writers during his early years at Universal

 

2) What does David Chase say he learned from working with Stephen J. Cannell on The Rockford Files?

A - That the most important thing for your hero is that he is the smartest person in the room

B - How to make a mean margarita

C - Humor is essential  to any good drama

D - Listen to input from your actors

 

3) David Chase reportedly loathes the work of which TWO of the following showrunners? 

A - David Simon

B - Aaron Sorkin

C - Alan Ball

D - David Milch

 

4) When David Chase reportedly says "I did it for the money. The only time I ever did that," to what is he referring? 

A - Writing for Kolchak: The Night Stalker

B - Showrunning Northern Exposure

C - Working as a male stripper

D - Producing a seventh season of The Sopranos

 

5) Asked to showrun The Wonder Years, David Chase came up with the idea of having Kevin Arnold converse "with the shade" of what literary figure?

A - Holden Caulfield

B - Huck Finn

C - Jem Finch

D - Oliver Twist

 

6) David Chase once reportedly told Sopranos writer Todd Kessler (pictured right): "I'll never truly be happy in life" until he does what? 

A - Directs an Oscar-winning film

B - Becomes known as a filmmaker rather than a television producer

C - Kills a man with his bare hands

D - Climbs Mount Everest

 

7) In the writers' room at Six Feet Under, the character of Nate Fisher was referred to as which of the following, because he was considered the "one normal guy in a house of freaks":

A - Mary Richards

B - Lisa Simpson

C - Marilyn Munster

D - Michael Bluth

 

8) During the making of the HBO miniseries The Corner, series cocreator David Simon (pictured left) steered clear of the set for what reason? 

A - He couldn't stand what they were doing to his book.

B - Director Charles Dutton didn't want him anywhere near the set.

C - The experience of watching his book being adapted into a film overwhelmed him emotionally.

D - He lost his GPS and couldn't find the way there.

 

9) When I'll Fly Away writer Henry Bromell told David Chase he wanted to go home at 6 pm a few nights a week because he had just had a baby and his wife wanted to go back to work, Chase replied:

A - "Why don't you just pack up your stuff and go home now?"

B - "Of course. What do you think, I'm a monster?"

C - "I need to know your top priority is this job, not your family. Make a choice."

D - "Don't make me sic Paulie Walnuts on you."

 

10) Damage's Patty Hewes was modeled after whom? 

A - Matthew Weiner

B - David Milch

C - David Chase

D - Glenn Close

 

11) In her book Free Fire Zone, playwright turned TV writer Theresa Rebeck writes a thinly veiled essay referring to which showrunner/former boss as Caligula ("He was a terrific storyteller - and he really could write. He was also, often, a terrible human being")? 

A - Matthew Weiner

B - David Milch

C - David Chase

D - David Simon

 

12) During NYPD Blue, Steven Bochco and David Milch (pictured right) got into a fierce, "nose to nose" argument after Milch demanded more money, but Bochco eventually felt bad and told Milch to ask him for anything he wanted and he would say OK. So what did Milch ask for? 

A - More money

B - Less money

C - A promise they would lunch together once a week

D - A monthly gambling allowance

 

13) When a junior Mad Men writer dared to interrupt venerable screenwriter Frank Pierson's yarn about a dog one day in the writers' room with a story about his own pet, how did Mad Men creator Matthew Weiner react? 

A - He took him aside and said, "Thank God; I thought that blowhard would never shut up!"

B - He took him aside and said, "No one gives a s*** about your dog."

C - He took him aside and shot him.

D - He made him watch Pierson's Cool Hand Luke and then write an essay about it.

 

14) Matthew Weiner is quoted in the book as saying "I'm often in the role of" which Mad Men character?

A - Don

B - Pete

C - Peggy

D - Sally

 

Answers

1 - B; 2 - A; 3 - B and D; 4 - B; 5 - A; 6 - C; 7 - C; 8 - B; 9 - C; 10 - C; 11 - B; 12 - C; 13 - B; 14 - D

twentysomething (Part I)

$
0
0

September is a melancholic time here because most of our summer interns head back to college (sad for us, at least). This year I asked my interns to leave something behind—their thoughts and opinions about the media they consume, and their visions for the future. Here are the players:

Ilana Berman, senior, Boston University, studying history and film/television
Read Berman's "Breaking Bad: A Short History of Drugs (On TV)"

Jeremy Einbinder, junior, Rowan University in New Jersey, studying radio-film-television
Read Einbinder's "Nick ‘90s: All That, and More"

Steve Filippi, senior, studying film at Ramapo College of New Jersey
Read Filippi's "24 Moments that Defined Jack Bauer"

Meghan Radespiel, senior, Ramapo, studying marketing and communications

Craig Solomon, freshly graduated from Eugene Lang College at the New School with a degree in screen and media studies
Read Solomon's "Nick ‘90s: All That, and More"

Diantha Vliet, recent Columbia University grad, MA in film studies, who has returned home to the Netherlands, at least for now


 

1) What does the term "television" imply to you? Is something like House of Cards, which has never aired on cable or broadcast TV, still television?

Meghan: Television is always changing for me. If you asked me ten years ago, television was me sitting Indian-style in front of my block of a television and watching Gilmore Girls.  Today, I'm mostly in a fetal-position on my bed watching Orange Is the New Black. So I would consider shows that have never aired on a cable channel, like House of Cards and Orange Is the New Black, television. I think of it as an offspring of television and the Internet. (FYI, OITNB will be doing a panel at the Paley Center in NY on 10/2- Ed.)

Craig: Television has consistently meant the same thing to me throughout the duration of my life.  It is a medium meant for programming that is designed from an anthological perspective with a condensed and minimalistic way of delivering plot through each individual episode. House of Cards is most certainly considered television in my mind.

Diantha: Television has not, for me, been about the physical box for a long time. It is more about watching something in a serialized/episodic format with relatively long episodes (over 15-20 minutes), so Netflix shows count as television for me. Any serialized online program below that would be a web series.

2) What defines your generation as TV viewers?

Ilana: Viewers of our generation demand content that's both instantaneous and sharable.

Jeremy: Something that is unique to our generation is the ability to watch television on the Internet and have our opinions instantly known to the world through social media.

Steven: The Internet plays a huge role in my generation's intake of television. Social media, YouTube, and online sites such as Hulu and Netflix have much more of an impact on us in regard to what shows to watch or how we watch them than television itself. Binge viewing has made it quite difficult for many people to watch TV "live," as waiting weeks and months between episodes and seasons seems unbearable compared with clicking "Next Episode" on Netflix.

Diantha: My generation has both benefited from and been disadvantaged by the rise of social media, which has made direct contact with networks and producers and actors easy. This contact is great because it gives fans a chance to be heard, but it has also made us somewhat entitled. I might say something about how reality TV has influenced my generation, but I think that is vastly overestimated.

Craig: A continued interest in ironic hate watching, amazing content that will keep you begging for more like a starving puppy, and of course obsessing over Netflix.

3) How do you view TV differently from your parents?

Craig: I care more about it. They watch it more to escape reality. TV enhances my scope of knowledge and calls for me to look to the past for inspiration.

Steven: My parents watch a lot of network cop shows such as Criminal Minds, Castle, and Rizzoli and Isles. They make it a major point of their day to watch their shows on television, or online if they are a day or two late. I tend to ignore my TV set; I use it when I have to, usually for movies or sports. I very rarely use it to watch TV shows on a set schedule.  Most of my TV viewing is watching older shows that have aired already, or catching up on past seasons of shows that are currently on TV.

Diantha: Other than the obvious online-community-related differences, I view TV in a much more critical light than my parents, both in terms of storytelling and in terms of TV as a socio-cultural construct. My parents enjoy TV because it is entertainment; for me it really is a large part of my life and I see it as having a real impact on society.

4) How has social media affected the way you watch TV?

Meghan: Social media has made TV interactive. For Twitter, you can personally tweet about the show or send messages to actors and writers of the show.  On Tumblr, you can post GIFs, videos and images from your favorite shows.  These social media sites allow you to find people who like the same shows as you and give you the chance to engage in a discussion. I'm never one to live tweet a show unless I'm joking around, but a lot of comedians have been live-tweeting The Bachelorette, which is usually hysterical.

Steven: I occasionally "live-tweet" late-night talk shows, and definitely participated in the Twitter-sphere during the 2012 presidential debates. As for television shows, I have live-tweeted The Walking Dead before, but that was only because I am not a fan of the show. Generally, I tend to avoid posting about shows that are currently on television, because I would hate to accidentally spoil these shows for other people. Recently, I watched The Sopranos in its entirety and "live-tweeted" (would this still be called live-tweeting, or would watching an older show that is no longer on TV be "dead-tweeting?") many times about the show's characters, acting, music, cinematography, and locations (which are all close to my house). I also tweet about Firefly whenever I rewatch the series. Twitter is the perfect place to vent when a show provides you with such a bittersweet mix of utter joy and downright misery. As for Facebook and Tumblr, they are spoiler havens and must be avoided at all costs.

Diantha: For me a large part of the appeal of episodic storytelling is the possibilities for community building. I have been part of fandoms since I was about fourteen, and have seen the HQ of fandom go from message boards to LiveJournal to places like Tumblr. I've never really watched TV without this, so they come hand in hand. Tumblr especially has upped the fandom ante as it is as much a place for mass hysteria as it is for well thought out meta-analysis. I do not, however, live tweet. It's just distracting. I'm trying to watch a show here.

Craig: It only encourages the network of people who share your common interests.  I personally do not live tweet shows, but rather look forward to reactions from fellow audience members.

5) What has TV done right or wrong in the last ten years?

Meghan: Wrong: The Bachelor. Right: Burning Love.

Steven: Television has rightly embraced the hour-long drama with its darker themes, even darker protagonists, and extremely cinematic feel. However, television has, at the same time, fully embraced the reality show.

Diantha: In recent years there have been some truly amazing shows, with amazing writing and casting and all that good stuff. There have also been some groundbreaking shows in terms of race, gender, and LGBTQ issues (The Fosters on ABC Family is a standout on all those fronts this season). On the other hand, network TV, like most other media, has become more and more driven by ad revenue. That kind of attitude leads to "accessibility" being valued over quality. That leads to amazing shows being canceled prematurely (see: Firefly, Pushing Daisies, Terriers), though I think the rise in social media has allowed fans to be more visible and thus more prized by ad companies, which might turn the tide (see: Arrested Development on Netflix, the Veronica Mars movie).   

6) How do you define the TV hero? What qualities must she or he have?

Ilana: Today's TV heroes are more often than not anti-heroes. Characters like Walter White of Breaking Bad or Don Draper of Mad Men, in my opinion, are especially captivating in how they challenge our perception of right and wrong.

Steven: The TV hero used to be gallant and noble and unafraid to lose his shirt if it meant doing the right thing (yes, I'm looking at you, Captain Kirk). Nowadays, the "hero" isn't really a hero at all. We live in a messed up world and what better way to blur the lines between fiction and reality than have Tony Soprano, Walter White, Vic Mackey, and Jack Bauer as heroes that we're "supposed" to root for and relate to?

Diantha: Balance. That's all you need. Heroes don't exist ... The "hero" of a show needs only to be relatable, and for that you need flaws that balance out moral fiber and lovable qualities. It helps if you get Joss Whedon to write them.

Jeremy: Relatable, flawed, endearing. Either socially ignorant or socially savvy to the point of manipulation yet with intimacy issues that make him or her somewhat endearing. Any quality that makes the viewer root for him or her to "win."

Craig: Jack Shepard and John Locke of ABC's Lost were the antithesis of one another, but both had admiral, moral qualities and gave people something to believe in. However, they were also severely flawed, and that made them more human and relatable. The counter question I ask is, "How would the television audience of the 1960s-1980s react to people rooting for an obese mobster who commits murder and infidelity regularly or a drug lord named Heisenberg?"  

7) What shows if any do you think speak specifically to your generation, and why?

Meghan: I hate to use this as an example because I know some will roll their eyes, but I think the first season of Girls speaks to a lot of women around my age. These four women are in this weird limbo period of their lives trying to not only figure themselves out, but also things like relationships and careers.  Though the show is overdramatized sometimes, the core is relatable, and I think that's the magic to it.

Diantha: There is no singular, unified way to experience a generation, so there is no single show that would appeal to all of us. And if anyone answers, "But what about Girls?!" I will judge them harshly, because even Lena Dunham can't pretend that show is representative of anyone's life but hers (and perhaps other privileged white girls like her).

twentysomething (Part II)

$
0
0

Continued from PART 1.

Recent Paley Center interns continue their meditation on the state of media. Once again, the players are:

Ilana Berman, senior, Boston University, studying history and film/television
Read Berman's "Breaking Bad: A Short History of Drugs (On TV)"

Jeremy Einbinder, junior, Rowan University in New Jersey, studying radio-film-television
Read Einbinder's "Nick ‘90s: All That, and More"

Steve Filippi, senior, studying film at Ramapo College of New Jersey
Read Filippi's "24 Moments that Defined Jack Bauer"

Meghan Radespiel, senior, Ramapo, studying marketing and communications

Craig Solomon, freshly graduated from Eugene Lang College at the New School with a degree in screen and media studies
Read Solomon's "Nick ‘90s: All That, and More"

Diantha Vliet, recent Columbia University grad, MA in film studies, who has returned home to the Netherlands, at least for now


 

8) Who are the important tastemakers to you? Whose opinions do you rely on in deciding what to watch?

Ilana: I take my cues from TV critics in newspapers and magazines. Favorites include: The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Variety, and The Hollywood Reporter.

Steven: I will sniff around various newspaper and online sources for reviews to get a sense of what is good or not. Even if a show is critically acclaimed, I usually still tend to hold off though until family or friends watch shows and recommend them to me.

Diantha: I wouldn't say I listen to anyone's opinion in particular. If I hear enough positive things about a show from critics and fandom alike, I'll try a show. If someone tells me a show is good on a particular issue (race for example), I will usually consider it. Also, I watch most pilots when they first air, so I usually figure out I like something without having to be told.

Craig: My friends, The Atlantic, and Twitter.

9) In the early days of television families gathered around the screen and spent time watching together. Do you ever watch television together with your whole family or even other members of your family?

Meghan: It's very rare for my whole family to get together and watch TV.  We all got into Game of Thrones this past season, so we watched that together. Though my mom would usually leave the room midepisode because she couldn't take "all the blood, killing and sex".  

Steven: When 24 was on TV, I would watch it live with my mom and we would tape it (yes, with a VCR), and then rewatch it with my father the next night. My mom and I would also watch Modern Family during its first season; however, like most shows, I wound up missing a few episodes and never went back. My parents still watch television together; I will occasionally join them, but it has not been for any specific show in recent years.

Diantha: I did when I was a child but not lately. Though my father and I like to watch makeover shows together from time to time.

Jeremy: When I was younger, I had many family shows. Now it can go years before finding one, and they have a history of not lasting long. We're glad to have found Under the Dome currently.

10) What kind of relationship do you have with TV shows? Are you monogamous and committed or do you tend to fool around with multiple shows, picking them up and putting them down when you choose to?

Meghan: I'm quite a floozy when it comes to TV shows. I don't have much of a type. I'll pick ya up and put ya down when I choose. Beware.

Diantha: I am a polyamorous serial dater in several intense long-term relationships. I'm willing to try almost any show once, but I have no issue with dropping them if they don't really grab me (casual dates). Some shows I can only watch full seasons at a time (seasonal flings). Some shows I watch when I remember they exist (booty calls). Some shows I was devoted to but they just became less interesting over time or the showrunner got too big a head (semi-friendly exes). There are some shows I love so much I will recommend them to every stranger on the street and watch every episode fifty times and buy the T-shirts (husbands).

Jeremy: I have a few favorite shows, but when I discover a new show that I like, I can be on it for a while. I may consider myself a "serial monogamist."

11) Do you prefer to watch TV shows as their air or to DVR them or to watch them online later?

Meghan: Online later. I can never catch my shows live, but that might be because I don't have a TV.

Ilana: I'd rather watch online than live. If that means waiting an extra day or week, I don't mind. I'd rather watch on my own schedule than be on someone else's, and have to sit through commercials.

Steven: I don't have a DVR but I very rarely catch shows as they air. I usually have to catch an encore showing on TV after the initial airdate or go online. I find that I have a hard time structuring my life around the TV guide.

Diantha: I prefer to watch online, because a) I am in a foreign country and waiting is not in my nature, and b) that way I can schedule TV around my day, not my day around TV.

Jeremy: I prefer to DVR them to avoid commercials and watch on my own schedule but to generally keep the frequency at which I watch the show as it was originally intended.

12) Do you ever still watch DVDs?

Meghan: Yes, my collection of the Buffy series is something I revisit often.

Ilana: I'll watch a DVD, but I won't buy one.

Diantha: I'll buy DVDs for shows I really love, but only if the extras are good.

Jeremy: Yes. Generally boxed sets of television seasons. I am also interested in behind-the-scenes material.

13) Ten or twenty years from now, when you have children of your own, what do you think their television viewing experience will be like?

Meghan: My guesses are that traditional TV will be gone and my brats will be watching TV on some sort of floating device that can follow them everywhere, which will drive a wedge in our relationship.  It will be like how I ignore my parents today, just slightly heightened.  

Diantha: For one they'll have me as a mom so they'll have great taste. They'll probably have more "interactive" TV, which will be networks/distributors/studios trying to get audiences to engage in a world with an increasing short attention span. It will be unnecessary but it will happen. There will also be less scheduled TV and the system will be more Netflix-style on demand, which is good. Shows will be both better and worse and somehow the exact same. Hopefully there will be more diversity and equal representation, but I doubt it. In twenty years laugh tracks will have made their third comeback. The method may change but the content will be the same. My children will read books.

14) What are your most trusted news sources?

Meghan: I try to read some newspaper articles every day, mostly from The Bergen Record and The New York Times.  I follow news outlets on Twitter like newspapers and TV channels because they link you to articles.  But if there's an issue I'm interested in, I'll do research from different outlets trying to come to some sort of clarity on the issue.  

Steven: I do not trust the news on TV. I have a few blogs that I like to peruse as well as some aggregate sites that gather articles from around the web, but I very rarely tune into CNN, Fox, or MSNBC (on TV or online), unless I am looking for something extremely specific. I believe the twenty-four-hour-news cycle is detrimental to the news process and leads to hyperbole and extreme bias. Personally, I feel that Twitter is easily the most accurate source for up-to-date news stories. ... Twitter is also the most objective.

Diantha: There is no such thing as definitive truth, so that's not something I go looking for. I get my news from various news websites (HuffPo, New York Times, etc), as well as from people I follow on Twitter and Tumblr. I especially like to read what people have to say about certain pieces of news on Tumblr because they're often quick investigators, critical thinkers, and there's a diverse range of people on there. Reddit is also often a place where I first read about things. In general when I read about an event I try to read different perspectives from different sources. Also The Daily Show and The Colbert Report, where I usually first hear about American politicians being caricatures of real people.

Jeremy: As an unabashed liberal/progressive, my news selection comes from admittedly slanted sources, sometimes online material such as The Young Turks and The David Pakman show. In terms of slanted television, Real Time with Bill Maher and The Daily Show, albeit using the term "news show" loosely, provide me with news and information from an entertaining perspective.

15) What five shows—past or present—would you bring to a desert island?

Ilana: Mad Men, Friday Night Lights, The West Wing, The Carol Burnett Show, Saturday Night Live

Steven: Seinfeld, 24, Firefly, The Sopranos, and Game of Thrones... I think. Breaking Bad and The Office are a close six and seven.

Craig: Lost, Breaking Bad, The Sopranos, Game of Thrones, Seinfeld

Meghan: Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Arrested Development, Veronica Mars, Six Feet Under, Seinfeld

Diantha: Battlestar Galactica (the reimagined series, because of superior Starbuck), Gilmore Girls, Doctor Who (classic and new), Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Parks and Recreation (because I need one show that won't make me cry every other episode)

16) The best show of all time is ....

Ilana: Mad Men is not just a TV show but an immersive experience—watching it makes us feel as if we're back in the 1960s, working at an agency with our friends and foes.

Steven: The Sopranos, due to its ground-breaking characters and themes, its superb acting and writing, and sheer scope.

Craig: Breaking Bad, because it never disappoints. It's a show that creates new expectations for plot, visual aesthetics, action, and character development. The suspense is poetic.

Diantha: Buffy the Vampire Slayer, because it contains the perfect mix of Whedon magic (funny, scary, depressing, surprising, heartfelt), with great character development, amazing female characters, very few episodes not worthy of rewatch, and the best musical episode of any show ever.

Meghan: Buffy the Vampire Slayer because Joss Whedon was able to combine fantasy and real life through using demons as metaphors for relatable fears that people still have today.

 

"The Americans" and Me

$
0
0

I started thinking about my Russian history class from junior year of high school recently, remembering endless days of Doctor Zhivago, a movie that took up over a month's worth of class time. In the corner of the classroom sat Mr. Weisberg, an insightful middle-aged pedagogue with a profound respect for the past. Last Friday (October 2) I was in the audience at a Paley Fest: Made in NY event where Mr. Weisberg eagerly answered fan questions about his new television show, The Americans.

By the time Joseph Weisberg came to Long Island High School for the Arts he was already exceptionally accomplished. He had published one novel, for young adults, called The Tenth Grade, and was in the process of finishing up his second, An Ordinary Spy, which draws direct inspiration from Weisberg's former profession—in the Central Intelligence Agency. Mr. Weisberg hardly looked the part of dashing spy; a person could easily walk by Joe Weisberg on the street eating a slice of pizza and it would never occur to him that here was a master of clandestine behavior. Likewise, Philip and Elizabeth Jennings, the two main characters of The Americans, are required to hide in plain sight, although the similarity with Mr. Weisberg ends there: ostensibly an ordinary married couple—working as travel agents, parents of two young children—they in "reality" function as KGB spies who risk their lives for the Motherland every day they spend on American soil.

After I took a second look at the first season of The Americans (the second season of the FX show premieres in January), the significance of Mr. Weisberg's lessons was reinforced. When our class watched Doctor Zhivago, he reminded us that it was a story about people and how they behaved in circumstances that would alter their way of life forever. The film creates a fictional narrative to guide us through major changes in Russian politics, including the formation of the U.S.S.R., conflicts with the White Army, and the Second World War. Doctor Zhivago's central characters, Yuri Zhivago and Larissa Antipova, are star-crossed lovers simultaneously bound together and pulled apart by violent conflicts in their homeland. The Americans takes place nearly thirty years after the closing section of Doctor Zhivago, yet in some respects can be interpreted as a spiritual descendant.

The Americans emphasizes the humanism of its characters without compromising their strict codes of beliefs. This friction is also a major component in Doctor Zhivago. Yuri Zhivago is a conscientious objector to the brutal tactics of the Russian political wars, yet his pivotal decisions correlate with his growing devotion to Lara. However, he ultimately chooses to abandon her in order to avoid the political manipulation that is ravaging their Motherland.  

The Jenningses' loyalty to the Soviet Union is constantly being tested, and their trust in Soviet covert methodology appears at times to crack over the course of the season (as when they are captured and tortured by Soviet agents posing as Americans), but they still blindly follow their chain of command. The development of the U.S.S.R. so brilliantly re-created in Doctor Zhivago reveals a window into the system that the Jennings live to protect. In the concluding portion of the film, Yuri Zhivago dies from heart failure chasing after Lara after catching a brief glimpse of her on a train. Elizabeth is critically injured in the line of duty in "The Colonel," the season-one finale of The Americans; in the most poignant moment of the episode she begs her husband in their native language to "Come Home." Despite all that the Jenningses have suffered through both personally and professionally, will their intimate bond trump all?

I walked away from the panel with extreme gratitude toward Mr. Weisberg. With The Americans, he has found the perfect medium for his kind of history lesson. His insights into Doctor Zhivago all those years ago provide a critical lens on the TV series. In each case the Soviet cause is the backdrop to a profound, moving story about love, devotion, loyalty, and honor.

Craig Solomon is an intern in the Curatorial Department at the Paley Center.



Watch Joseph Weisberg and the cast and producers of The Americans at PaleyFest: Made In NY.

   

 

 

Viewing all 23 articles
Browse latest View live